Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 12:24:41 GMT
No, I did say that an argument ad populum was far from satisfactory and didn't suggest that would settle anything, the point was in fact to demonstrate your side of the argument as being valid, that different people will draw different conclusions from the same evidence. I've never suggested that you aren't entitled to disagree with any or all of what I say. Are we agreed and ready to talk about something different? Any thoughts on my comment about the advantages of talking to people about hope and opportunity rather than focusing on negatives? Ah, I see you've added a bit to your last post, looking forward to your thoughts. Maybe listen to the guy from that charity, his first hand testimony may be more compelling than my waffling on? Yep, let's move on. So is this the video you posted a while ago about the guy in a red t-shirt a few pages ago? I'll admit I didn't actually watch or follow the thread much at all at that point. The first interview I saw, purely by chance, with the guy from that charity, is him having a phone conversation with Julia Hartley-Brewer, if I pop up a link to that are you OK with watching it? I did and ignored what Ms Hartley-Brewer was saying, I only wanted to hear from the guy involved.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jul 1, 2020 12:34:37 GMT
Yep, let's move on. So is this the video you posted a while ago about the guy in a red t-shirt a few pages ago? I'll admit I didn't actually watch or follow the thread much at all at that point. The first interview I saw, purely by chance, with the guy from that charity, is him having a phone conversation with Julia Hartley-Brewer, if I pop up a link to that are you OK with watching it? I did and ignored what Ms Hartley-Brewer was saying, I only wanted to hear from the guy involved. Sure, I can give it a go later tonight
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 12:38:32 GMT
I think we have a chicken and egg thing with this 2 parent family data situation? The trustees told him that it was fear of pressure, in the present environment, from corporate partners, that caused them to remove him. Do you know of a better system than capitalism? I'm with you on the environment, I think. When the noise, real news, fake news, lies, counter lies around Trump have all died down and history judges him, his record on the environment will be what ultimately condemns him, in my opinion. 1. "I think we have a chicken and egg thing with this 2 parent family data situation?" I don't agree. If we, as a society, set minimum standards of housing, education, health provision and social services then it is my opinion that many of the issues causing family breakdown will be ameliorated. Eliminated? No of course not. 2. "The trustees told him that it was fear of pressure, in the present environment, from corporate partners". He said that? Or was that what the Trustees said? I can imagine that this could well be the case, which leaves the Trustees in an invideous position. Rather like the issues Facebook are facing currently. 3. "Do you know of a better system than capitalism?" I would never claim to. But I do believe we must understand the consequences of what we do. (Education comes into play here). So if we militarily, or commercially, exploit the natural reserves or subjugate the local population to working practices that would be illegal in our own country, then those peoples have every right to call us out. The guy said that, I believe him, he's going to look pretty daft if it's not the case, and he's not challenging the decision, he says that he's more interested in the charity meeting it's objectives than getting caught up in a public dispute about what's happened to him. This is where our views diverge, there's a large element of personal responsibility which people need to accept for themselves. This is a great country. Could it be better, yes, but there's a reason why people risk their lives and cross other 'safe' countries to get here, that's not because it's a racist Hell hole with no opportunity. Those figures about Indian and Asian wage demonstrate that skin colour in itself isn't a barrier to success, that's played out in Australia also. Should we give the needy a helping hand? Of course. Is it better to get people considering what they need to do to get social housing or what they can do with their lives to get a nice home of their own for themselves and their family. I know which message sounds more positive and progressive to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 12:40:14 GMT
The first interview I saw, purely by chance, with the guy from that charity, is him having a phone conversation with Julia Hartley-Brewer, if I pop up a link to that are you OK with watching it? I did and ignored what Ms Hartley-Brewer was saying, I only wanted to hear from the guy involved. Sure, I can give it a go later tonight Here you go; BTW, I watch several of their presenters, including O'Brien, who I think is very good at what he does and often drops in useful bits of information. Don't like him when he's just ranting, but he usually prepares well for interviews, so worth watching.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 13:42:59 GMT
Sure, I can give it a go later tonight Here you go; BTW, I watch several of their presenters, including O'Brien, who I think is very good at what he does and often drops in useful bits of information. Don't like him when he's just ranting, but he usually prepares well for interviews, so worth watching. There you have it, in his own words. "They said (the Trustees) that he had brought the Charity into disrepute". They are trustees, that's their call to make. You might disagree with it, but like any employer they have the right to make that judgement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 14:01:30 GMT
So,
"This is where our views diverge, there's a large element of personal responsibility which people need to accept for themselves. This is a great country. Could it be better, yes, but there's a reason why people risk their lives and cross other 'safe' countries to get here, that's not because it's a racist Hell hole with no opportunity. Those figures about Indian and Asian wage demonstrate that skin colour in itself isn't a barrier to success, that's played out in Australia also.
Should we give the needy a helping hand? Of course. Is it better to get people considering what they need to do to get social housing or what they can do with their lives to get a nice home of their own for themselves and their family. I know which message sounds more positive and progressive to me."
A lot of that is right out of the Friedrich Hayek handbook.
I mean really. Who is going to deny personal responsibility? No the real issue is income distribution, measurable by either direct income or the fruits of our economy distributed through provision of high class services. Then we get the usual nationalist trope. "This is a great country....look at all the immigrants who want to come here." Sure they do, look at what they running away from. So is it push, or is it pull? Then look where they come from, in no particular order. Africa generally, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq.
Take a map, pin point those countries and then overlay invasion, subjugation and colonisation. Add a big pinch of resource theft. Look at our part in all of that and say, with any degree of seriousness, that this is a great country.
On housing. Are you serious? Are you aware of the length of the waiting list for social housing? "A nice home of their own" What planet are you on? You are aware of the deposits required, the actual cost of houses?
When you receiving in work benefits, barely able to pay the rent, struggle to feed your kids, scrape to pay utility bills, laying in bed at night dreaming of a "nice home of your own", is just that, a dream, a fantasy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 15:12:23 GMT
Absolutely, but I'm not the one championing BLM whilst refusing to give up the material goods that cause wars amongst black people- you are. hypocrisy. Yeah, I'm fully aware that capitalism is funded by violence. Selling arms etc, slavery, war etc.. by nation states and private companies. The only thing we can do to even try to end that is educate. Your individualist politics isn't going to help at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 16:01:07 GMT
So, "This is where our views diverge, there's a large element of personal responsibility which people need to accept for themselves. This is a great country. Could it be better, yes, but there's a reason why people risk their lives and cross other 'safe' countries to get here, that's not because it's a racist Hell hole with no opportunity. Those figures about Indian and Asian wage demonstrate that skin colour in itself isn't a barrier to success, that's played out in Australia also. Should we give the needy a helping hand? Of course. Is it better to get people considering what they need to do to get social housing or what they can do with their lives to get a nice home of their own for themselves and their family. I know which message sounds more positive and progressive to me." A lot of that is right out of the Friedrich Hayek handbook. I mean really. Who is going to deny personal responsibility? No the real issue is income distribution, measurable by either direct income or the fruits of our economy distributed through provision of high class services. Then we get the usual nationalist trope. "This is a great country....look at all the immigrants who want to come here." Sure they do, look at what they running away from. So is it push, or is it pull? Then look where they come from, in no particular order. Africa generally, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq. Take a map, pin point those countries and then overlay invasion, subjugation and colonisation. Add a big pinch of resource theft. Look at our part in all of that and say, with any degree of seriousness, that this is a great country. On housing. Are you serious? Are you aware of the length of the waiting list for social housing? "A nice home of their own" What planet are you on? You are aware of the deposits required, the actual cost of houses? When you receiving in work benefits, barely able to pay the rent, struggle to feed your kids, scrape to pay utility bills, laying in bed at night dreaming of a "nice home of your own", is just that, a dream, a fantasy. Just 3 points. How many 'safe' countries do people from Africa typically cross to arrive at this Hell hole? Yes, perfectly serious, stop the victim narrative and give people hope. Asians, Indians etc cope perfectly well, despite not having white skin. That holes the skin colour argument beneath the waterline, now we see a different argument proposed, one we've not heard before, Brown privilege. Give me a break. Your argument starts with a conclusion and ignores everything along the way that's inconvenient. Hope over fear for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 16:06:55 GMT
1. "I think we have a chicken and egg thing with this 2 parent family data situation?" I don't agree. If we, as a society, set minimum standards of housing, education, health provision and social services then it is my opinion that many of the issues causing family breakdown will be ameliorated. Eliminated? No of course not. 2. "The trustees told him that it was fear of pressure, in the present environment, from corporate partners". He said that? Or was that what the Trustees said? I can imagine that this could well be the case, which leaves the Trustees in an invideous position. Rather like the issues Facebook are facing currently. 3. "Do you know of a better system than capitalism?" I would never claim to. But I do believe we must understand the consequences of what we do. (Education comes into play here). So if we militarily, or commercially, exploit the natural reserves or subjugate the local population to working practices that would be illegal in our own country, then those peoples have every right to call us out. The guy said that, I believe him, he's going to look pretty daft if it's not the case, and he's not challenging the decision, he says that he's more interested in the charity meeting it's objectives than getting caught up in a public dispute about what's happened to him. This is where our views diverge, there's a large element of personal responsibility which people need to accept for themselves. This is a great country. Could it be better, yes, but there's a reason why people risk their lives and cross other 'safe' countries to get here, that's not because it's a racist Hell hole with no opportunity. Those figures about Indian and Asian wage demonstrate that skin colour in itself isn't a barrier to success, that's played out in Australia also. Should we give the needy a helping hand? Of course. Is it better to get people considering what they need to do to get social housing or what they can do with their lives to get a nice home of their own for themselves and their family. I know which message sounds more positive and progressive to me. But that’s not to say that they want to come here because it’s a chance to give mutual respect- we give them a better way of life they become highly valued doctors in our NHS for example- they may view it (and going by vox pops I’ve seen some totally do) as our poverty is still better than the poverty in their native land. Word has got out that the U.K. provides for the basic needs of families, ie our culture does not like seeing children on the streets and that goes some way to explaining why people travel through so many other countries and then risk their lives trying to cross the channel, although there are obviously other factors. I understand that there is an ‘underground’ Thai and Vietnamese community that attracts people to the U.K. as they can ‘exist off the grid’ pretty successfully and work in the nail bars or whatever. Essentially the motivation for migrating to the U.K is varied and complex.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 16:09:36 GMT
Here you go; BTW, I watch several of their presenters, including O'Brien, who I think is very good at what he does and often drops in useful bits of information. Don't like him when he's just ranting, but he usually prepares well for interviews, so worth watching. There you have it, in his own words. "They said (the Trustees) that he had brought the Charity into disrepute". They are trustees, that's their call to make. You might disagree with it, but like any employer they have the right to make that judgement. But has he? That's the actual question. And one that he asks. Anyway, you've misquoted him, what he actually says is that the trustees told him, ''You've brought the charity into disrepute, just look at Twitter''. So what we have here is Twitter outrage setting what constitutes disrepute. May as well just disband tribunals and our judicial system then and just see what Twitter reckons. You still haven't answered the original question, which was, do you think that a Man who has done so much to help disadvantaged youngsters should lose his position for what he wrote there? My position is that, no, absolutely not he shouldn't, what's yours?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 16:13:55 GMT
Absolutely, but I'm not the one championing BLM whilst refusing to give up the material goods that cause wars amongst black people- you are. hypocrisy. Yeah, I'm fully aware that capitalism is funded by violence. Selling arms etc, slavery, war etc.. by nation states and private companies. The only thing we can do to even try to end that is educate. Your individualist politics isn't going to help at all. Again I agree, but this is where I find that the moral outrage that we tend to see is misplaced because really we all contribute to the problems that we complain about. Instead of nonsense like taking a knee or changing a profile pic we could all take some actual action by refusing to buy further electronic consumables that people in 3rd world economies are dying to make but your average social justice warrior or pop star like Beyoncé doesn’t want to make those sort of personal sacrifices. They need their electronic devices so they can complain and brow beat others on the internet. So what I’m saying is let’s all be cognisant of the part that we play and evaluate whether our part really gives us the moral high ground to brow beat others about how black lives matter, because for most of us the sad reality is that some black lives matter but the ones who die so we can have the latest iphone are necessary collateral damage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 16:20:28 GMT
Yeah, I'm fully aware that capitalism is funded by violence. Selling arms etc, slavery, war etc.. by nation states and private companies. The only thing we can do to even try to end that is educate. Your individualist politics isn't going to help at all. Again I agree, but this is where I find that the moral outrage that we tend to see is misplaced because really we all contribute to the problems that we complain about. Instead of nonsense like taking a knee or changing a profile pic we could all take some actual action by refusing to buy further electronic consumables that people in 3rd world economies are dying to make but your average social justice warrior or pop star like Beyoncé doesn’t want to make those sort of personal sacrifices. They need their electronic devices so they can complain and brow beat others on the internet. So what I’m saying is let’s all be cognisant of the part that we play and evaluate whether our part really gives us the moral high ground to brow beat others about how black lives matter, because for most of us the sad reality is that some black lives matter but the ones who die so we can have the latest iphone are necessary collateral damage. Not happening. Not a single one of this lot on here have even confirmed yet that they are leaving their property to a disadvantaged black family in their will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 18:39:46 GMT
So, "This is where our views diverge, there's a large element of personal responsibility which people need to accept for themselves. This is a great country. Could it be better, yes, but there's a reason why people risk their lives and cross other 'safe' countries to get here, that's not because it's a racist Hell hole with no opportunity. Those figures about Indian and Asian wage demonstrate that skin colour in itself isn't a barrier to success, that's played out in Australia also. Should we give the needy a helping hand? Of course. Is it better to get people considering what they need to do to get social housing or what they can do with their lives to get a nice home of their own for themselves and their family. I know which message sounds more positive and progressive to me." A lot of that is right out of the Friedrich Hayek handbook. I mean really. Who is going to deny personal responsibility? No the real issue is income distribution, measurable by either direct income or the fruits of our economy distributed through provision of high class services. Then we get the usual nationalist trope. "This is a great country....look at all the immigrants who want to come here." Sure they do, look at what they running away from. So is it push, or is it pull? Then look where they come from, in no particular order. Africa generally, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq. Take a map, pin point those countries and then overlay invasion, subjugation and colonisation. Add a big pinch of resource theft. Look at our part in all of that and say, with any degree of seriousness, that this is a great country. On housing. Are you serious? Are you aware of the length of the waiting list for social housing? "A nice home of their own" What planet are you on? You are aware of the deposits required, the actual cost of houses? When you receiving in work benefits, barely able to pay the rent, struggle to feed your kids, scrape to pay utility bills, laying in bed at night dreaming of a "nice home of your own", is just that, a dream, a fantasy. Just 3 points. How many 'safe' countries do people from Africa typically cross to arrive at this Hell hole? Yes, perfectly serious, stop the victim narrative and give people hope. Asians, Indians etc cope perfectly well, despite not having white skin. That holes the skin colour argument beneath the waterline, now we see a different argument proposed, one we've not heard before, Brown privilege. Give me a break. Your argument starts with a conclusion and ignores everything along the way that's inconvenient. Hope over fear for me. My comments were not aimed at skin colour or race. Who described the UK as a hell hole?? What I described is the reality for far to many people in the UK.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 18:42:55 GMT
There you have it, in his own words. "They said (the Trustees) that he had brought the Charity into disrepute". They are trustees, that's their call to make. You might disagree with it, but like any employer they have the right to make that judgement. But has he? That's the actual question. And one that he asks. You still haven't answered the original question, which was, do you think that a Man who has done so much to help disadvantaged youngsters should lose his position for what he wrote there? My position is that, no, absolutely not he shouldn't, what's yours? My position is that the Trustees, Governed by their own articles and under the jurisdiction of the charity commission, will act in the best interests of their charity. I am not in a position to judge the veracity of their decision, as you are not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 18:44:41 GMT
Again I agree, but this is where I find that the moral outrage that we tend to see is misplaced because really we all contribute to the problems that we complain about. Instead of nonsense like taking a knee or changing a profile pic we could all take some actual action by refusing to buy further electronic consumables that people in 3rd world economies are dying to make but your average social justice warrior or pop star like Beyoncé doesn’t want to make those sort of personal sacrifices. They need their electronic devices so they can complain and brow beat others on the internet. So what I’m saying is let’s all be cognisant of the part that we play and evaluate whether our part really gives us the moral high ground to brow beat others about how black lives matter, because for most of us the sad reality is that some black lives matter but the ones who die so we can have the latest iphone are necessary collateral damage. Not happening. Not a single one of this lot on here have even confirmed yet that they are leaving their property to a disadvantaged black family in their will. 😂😂😂
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 18:51:08 GMT
Here you go; BTW, I watch several of their presenters, including O'Brien, who I think is very good at what he does and often drops in useful bits of information. Don't like him when he's just ranting, but he usually prepares well for interviews, so worth watching. There you have it, in his own words. "They said (the Trustees) that he had brought the Charity into disrepute". They are trustees, that's their call to make. You might disagree with it, but like any employer they have the right to make that judgement. On that basis there is no such thing as employee rights? If an employer thinks that by wearing the wrong colour socks you’ve brought the company into disrepute you cannot really complain because they have the right to determine what constitutes ‘disrepute’ regardless of how unreasonable their interpretation may be?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 19:14:05 GMT
But has he? That's the actual question. And one that he asks. You still haven't answered the original question, which was, do you think that a Man who has done so much to help disadvantaged youngsters should lose his position for what he wrote there? My position is that, no, absolutely not he shouldn't, what's yours? My position is that the Trustees, Governed by their own articles and under the jurisdiction of the charity commission, will act in the best interests of their charity. I am not in a position to judge the veracity of their decision, as you are not. OK, so we are on opposing sides yet again. I don't think in a million years that it's the correct decision. A good man driven out, just in case of Twitter outrage, for me that's very sad. This outrage isn't coming from my side of politics. I hope you and your friends on the left are pleased with yourselves. Personally, I'm disgusted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 19:15:55 GMT
There you have it, in his own words. "They said (the Trustees) that he had brought the Charity into disrepute". They are trustees, that's their call to make. You might disagree with it, but like any employer they have the right to make that judgement. On that basis there is no such thing as employee rights? If an employer thinks that by wearing the wrong colour socks you’ve brought the company into disrepute you cannot really complain because they have the right to determine what constitutes ‘disrepute’ regardless of how unreasonable their interpretation may be? He's a good man, he says that he is walking away because a public fight actually would harm the charity. Disgusting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 19:17:08 GMT
Just 3 points. How many 'safe' countries do people from Africa typically cross to arrive at this Hell hole? Yes, perfectly serious, stop the victim narrative and give people hope. Asians, Indians etc cope perfectly well, despite not having white skin. That holes the skin colour argument beneath the waterline, now we see a different argument proposed, one we've not heard before, Brown privilege. Give me a break. Your argument starts with a conclusion and ignores everything along the way that's inconvenient. Hope over fear for me. My comments were not aimed at skin colour or race. Who described the UK as a hell hole?? What I described is the reality for far to many people in the UK.Then gift all of your possessions to the disadvantaged, go on, double dare you.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jul 1, 2020 22:05:32 GMT
Sure, I can give it a go later tonight Here you go; BTW, I watch several of their presenters, including O'Brien, who I think is very good at what he does and often drops in useful bits of information. Don't like him when he's just ranting, but he usually prepares well for interviews, so worth watching. So just got round to watching it. Before commenting on his sacking, I would certainly like to read the blog post, to make an informed decision whether it was the right call. I had a quick google, but couldn't seem to find anything. Do you have the link? Definitely though, the CEO should really think about what he's writing. If it was a tweet, maybe it could be forgiven, but for someone to write a blog (I assume something weekly/monthly?) then he really needs to be smarter, whatever he said. My currently company makes us sign about social media presence. Blimey, back when I was in retail 10 years ago, there was specific training and sign offs on social media, how to act and that it anything we say on social media can be treated as a sackable offence. Regarding focusing on the opportunities vs victim - I do agree, to an extent. What I disagree with is that it's painted as an either/or situation. Why not both? Certainly there is no need to "force" the victim on people, that just creates division. But I don't think anyone is forcing anything here, you choose to listen or you don't. You decide whether that resonates with you, or you don't. I think the problem is that we also need to acknowledge the victimisation, otherwise for me it's just a case of ignoring it. EG, 'Thanks for sharing your views how you feel like we've been racist and you're upset, but let's not focus on that - let's focus on the opportunities in front of you'. I'd prefer 'You're right, things haven't been fair. We acknowledge that and we apologise. Let's work together to create equal opportunity - come together and move forward'.
|
|