|
|
Post by Gastafari on Sept 30, 2020 13:38:34 GMT
I didn't say he didn't say it. BUT it was a cheap shot, Trump has denounced and condemned White Supremacist violence on several occasions. In yesterdays debate, Joe Biden was asked on his comments about calling Housing Projects "Racial Jungles" and full of "Predators", he completely refused to answer the question. Why wasn't he asked to answer that? Or denounce or condemn it? Or his use of the "N Word" multiple times? Why wasn't Biden questioned on his quote that "Antifa is only an idea"? All about balance. Whataboutery rings loud. If it was a cheap shot, why didn't he just put it down? Instead he encouraged the Proud Boys to be armed and ready. Disgraceful It should be an impartial debate. If you're going to go down that route, it should be for both people in the debate, not just one way. Isn't that what debates are for? I mean just yesterday I was asked "What about your views on other "Right Wing" leaders. You have also asked me "What about" X,Y and Z too, I guess it's allowed as long as you're not in a Presidential debate and it doesn't fit into your warped narrative. He was asked will he condemn it, and he said "Sure". Joe Biden refused to answer any of his questions on similar subjects. Like I said all about balance, not the ridiculous term "Whataboutery". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 14:28:45 GMT
Anyone see the debate? Saw snippets, one of my sons' watched the whole thing (silly boy) He described it as a disgrace, with a ranting lunatic stopping any kind of discussion let alone debate. Yes Trump... I watched all of it. It wasn't great, but it was the complete opposite of what you describe. The moderator, Chris Wallace turned it into a farce. Whichever side you're on, these debates need to be impartial, Wallace was the one who stopped any kind of discussion, let alone debate. Even though Wallace was a joke, Trump didn't need to do a lot, as Biden failed to answer the majority of the key questions Wallace asked, even though he was given the chance to without any interuptions, unlike Trump. Biden also just got personal, because he was unable to answer the majority of the key questions. From the telegraph, which is what is regarded as a Tory rag |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 14:29:48 GMT
I didn't say he didn't say it. BUT it was a cheap shot, Trump has denounced and condemned White Supremacist violence on several occasions. In yesterdays debate, Joe Biden was asked on his comments about calling Housing Projects "Racial Jungles" and full of "Predators", he completely refused to answer the question. Why wasn't he asked to answer that? Or denounce or condemn it? Or his use of the "N Word" multiple times? Why wasn't Biden questioned on his quote that "Antifa is only an idea"? All about balance. Whataboutery rings loud. If it was a cheap shot, why didn't he just put it down? Instead he encouraged the Proud Boys to be armed and ready. Disgraceful He's a laugh a minute this one isn't he. |
|
|
|
Post by Icegas on Sept 30, 2020 14:36:16 GMT
I think you should stop watching BBC or CNN and learn more about the real Trump and the good he has done in these four years.People like you through Trump was a idiot this time 4 years ago and dispute the good things he has done during that time, and how well the economy was around the world Pre C19 will never give the man any praise for anything. We were told he has no chance 4 years ago and he won.He will win by a landslide this November for one reason - the silent voter. The leftie bias media put there polls up right now and scream the loudest but this generation of Libtard snowflakes won't get in office while someone that is a true leader with a set of balls like Trump does is on the otherside of the ballet box to them.Was the case with Clinton and will be the same with Biden. Best laugh for a while. We will see in a month my friend. |
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Sept 30, 2020 14:41:49 GMT
I watched all of it. It wasn't great, but it was the complete opposite of what you describe. The moderator, Chris Wallace turned it into a farce. Whichever side you're on, these debates need to be impartial, Wallace was the one who stopped any kind of discussion, let alone debate. Even though Wallace was a joke, Trump didn't need to do a lot, as Biden failed to answer the majority of the key questions Wallace asked, even though he was given the chance to without any interuptions, unlike Trump. Biden also just got personal, because he was unable to answer the majority of the key questions. From the telegraph, which is what is regarded as a Tory rag That's funny, I thought you refused to listen to people because you deemed them conservative, yet your now posting links from "Tory Rags". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 15:10:44 GMT
From the telegraph, which is what is regarded as a Tory rag That's funny, I thought you refused to listen to people because you deemed them conservative, yet your now posting links from "Tory Rags". I'll listen to anyone tbh, especially during work hours. I can't answer your post fully, as it doesn't make much sense. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,548 
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Sept 30, 2020 15:22:13 GMT
To date Gastafari you have not provided a shred of evidence for your opinions. Instead you sound like a star struck kid, just like the one's in an adult body waving placards at Trump rallies whilst spreading Covid 19. The result of course is not guaranteed for either side, but a lot of us just hope the Americans consign this awful period, led by a , to history. I think you should stop watching BBC or CNN and learn more about the real Trump and the good he has done in these four years.People like you through Trump was a idiot this time 4 years ago and dispute the good things he has done during that time, and how well the economy was around the world Pre C19 will never give the man any praise for anything. We were told he has no chance 4 years ago and he won.He will win by a landslide this November for one reason - the silent voter. The leftie bias media put there polls up right now and scream the loudest but this generation of Libtard snowflakes won't get in office while someone that is a true leader with a set of balls like Trump does is on the otherside of the ballet box to them.Was the case with Clinton and will be the same with Biden. I assume "Libtard" is a portmanteau word, not a good look really. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 15:30:05 GMT
I think you should stop watching BBC or CNN and learn more about the real Trump and the good he has done in these four years.People like you through Trump was a idiot this time 4 years ago and dispute the good things he has done during that time, and how well the economy was around the world Pre C19 will never give the man any praise for anything. We were told he has no chance 4 years ago and he won.He will win by a landslide this November for one reason - the silent voter. The leftie bias media put there polls up right now and scream the loudest but this generation of Libtard snowflakes won't get in office while someone that is a true leader with a set of balls like Trump does is on the otherside of the ballet box to them.Was the case with Clinton and will be the same with Biden. I assume "Libtard" is a portmanteau word, not a good look really. It's an extreme right-wing word designed to 'trigger the libs'... if you say that you find it repulsive, then 'It's political correctness gone mad'. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,548
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Sept 30, 2020 16:08:14 GMT
I assume "Libtard" is a portmanteau word, not a good look really. It's an extreme right-wing word designed to 'trigger the libs'... if you say that you find it repulsive, then 'It's political correctness gone mad'. My son is 'retarded' so can't say I'm too impressed by the term. I know it's designed to elicit a reaction but says more about the poster than the reaction. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 16:30:02 GMT
It's an extreme right-wing word designed to 'trigger the libs'... if you say that you find it repulsive, then 'It's political correctness gone mad'. My son is 'retarded' so can't say I'm too impressed by the term. I know it's designed to elicit a reaction but says more about the poster than the reaction. Do we expect anything else from certain posters? |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 30, 2020 16:31:51 GMT
We will see in a month my friend. Don't call me that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 16:37:10 GMT
We will see in a month my friend. Don't call me that. Emmmm...indeed. Meanwhile, another snippet from last night. Wallace: Will you urge your supporters to stay calm during this extended period, not to engage in any civil unrest? And will you pledge tonight that you will not declare victory until the election has been independently certified? President Trump, you go first. Trump: I'm urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully. Because that's what has to happen. I am urging them to do it. As you know, today, there was a big problem. In Philadelphia they went in to watch. They were called poll watchers -- a very safe, very nice thing. They were thrown out. They weren't allowed to watch. You know why? Because bad things happen in Philadelphia, bad things. And I -- I am urging -- I am urging my people. I hope it's going to be a fair election. If it's a fair election... Wallace: You're urging them what? Trump: ... I am 100% on board. But if I see tens of thousands of ballots being manipulated, I can't go along with that. And I'll tell you what. From a common-sense... Wallace: What does that mean, you can't go along? Does that mean you're going to tell your people to take to the streets? Trump: I'll tell you what it means. It means you have a fraudulent election. You're sending out 80 million ballots. Asked directly whether he will tell his voters not to engage in any sort of violence or "civil unrest" while the votes are being counted on and beyond November 3, the President of the United States not only refused to do so but also reiterated his call to his supporters to go to polling places and "watch" people casting votes. Totalitarianism in all its glory. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 30, 2020 16:41:36 GMT
Emmmm...indeed. Meanwhile, another snippet from last night. Wallace: Will you urge your supporters to stay calm during this extended period, not to engage in any civil unrest? And will you pledge tonight that you will not declare victory until the election has been independently certified? President Trump, you go first. Trump: I'm urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully. Because that's what has to happen. I am urging them to do it. As you know, today, there was a big problem. In Philadelphia they went in to watch. They were called poll watchers -- a very safe, very nice thing. They were thrown out. They weren't allowed to watch. You know why? Because bad things happen in Philadelphia, bad things. And I -- I am urging -- I am urging my people. I hope it's going to be a fair election. If it's a fair election... Wallace: You're urging them what? Trump: ... I am 100% on board. But if I see tens of thousands of ballots being manipulated, I can't go along with that. And I'll tell you what. From a common-sense... Wallace: What does that mean, you can't go along? Does that mean you're going to tell your people to take to the streets? Trump: I'll tell you what it means. It means you have a fraudulent election. You're sending out 80 million ballots. Asked directly whether he will tell his voters not to engage in any sort of violence or "civil unrest" while the votes are being counted on and beyond November 3, the President of the United States not only refused to do so but also reiterated his call to his supporters to go to polling places and "watch" people casting votes. Totalitarianism in all its glory. If he gets in again, they deserve it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 17:13:32 GMT
Emmmm...indeed. Meanwhile, another snippet from last night. Wallace: Will you urge your supporters to stay calm during this extended period, not to engage in any civil unrest? And will you pledge tonight that you will not declare victory until the election has been independently certified? President Trump, you go first. Trump: I'm urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully. Because that's what has to happen. I am urging them to do it. As you know, today, there was a big problem. In Philadelphia they went in to watch. They were called poll watchers -- a very safe, very nice thing. They were thrown out. They weren't allowed to watch. You know why? Because bad things happen in Philadelphia, bad things. And I -- I am urging -- I am urging my people. I hope it's going to be a fair election. If it's a fair election... Wallace: You're urging them what? Trump: ... I am 100% on board. But if I see tens of thousands of ballots being manipulated, I can't go along with that. And I'll tell you what. From a common-sense... Wallace: What does that mean, you can't go along? Does that mean you're going to tell your people to take to the streets? Trump: I'll tell you what it means. It means you have a fraudulent election. You're sending out 80 million ballots. Asked directly whether he will tell his voters not to engage in any sort of violence or "civil unrest" while the votes are being counted on and beyond November 3, the President of the United States not only refused to do so but also reiterated his call to his supporters to go to polling places and "watch" people casting votes. Totalitarianism in all its glory. If he gets in again, they deserve it. For those of us with family there, it's frightening. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 30, 2020 17:19:39 GMT
If he gets in again, they deserve it. For those of us with family there, it's frightening. I can imagine. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 17:43:47 GMT
My son is 'retarded' so can't say I'm too impressed by the term. I know it's designed to elicit a reaction but says more about the poster than the reaction. Do we expect anything else from certain posters? Pot and kettle spring to mind. Have you forgotten how many offensive remarks and generalisations you’ve made on these general chat pages? |
|
|
|
Post by Icegas on Sept 30, 2020 18:03:52 GMT
I assume "Libtard" is a portmanteau word, not a good look really. It's an extreme right-wing word designed to 'trigger the libs'... if you say that you find it repulsive, then 'It's political correctness gone mad'. It's the same as being called and labelled as some kind of " is't " just because you have different views to the Libtards of today. I've got no problem with liberation's or someone thinking left wing, I'm nationally that way myself.My only problem is how the modern day lefties way of reacting to someone that doesn't agree with them. And that's why people like me drop the Libtard bomb in from time to time.👍 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 18:19:57 GMT
Do we expect anything else from certain posters? Pot and kettle spring to mind. Have you forgotten how many offensive remarks and generalisations you’ve made on these general chat pages? Have I? I am sure my views upset some but I don't think I have ever used terms like "libtard" |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 18:24:05 GMT
It's an extreme right-wing word designed to 'trigger the libs'... if you say that you find it repulsive, then 'It's political correctness gone mad'. It's the same as being called and labelled as some kind of " is't " just because you have different views to the Libtards of today. I've got no problem with liberation's or someone thinking left wing, I'm nationally that way myself.My only problem is how the modern day lefties way of reacting to someone that doesn't agree with them. And that's why people like me drop the Libtard bomb in from time to time.👍 👎👎👎 |
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Sept 30, 2020 18:33:23 GMT
Why are you advertising tobacco products on a sports-orientated forum? |
|
