|
|
Post by chewbacca on Mar 20, 2024 13:16:39 GMT
Strange what gets people backs up on here, tell me what he has done that is really that bad? Just did. |
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 15:26:07 GMT
Strange what gets people backs up on here, tell me what he has done that is really that bad? Hahaha! There's none so blind as those that choose not to read..!? |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Mar 20, 2024 15:34:04 GMT
I think it's quite disrespectful to speculate about whether someone has lost their job or not, no matter what you might think of them. Kind regards John Malyckyj It's no more or less disrespectful than some employees that have lost their job by his hand, and subsequently litigated against the club because of him. Please provide details and names of all these litigation cases. I find it strange that if they did happen, none of them has found its way into the public domain. |
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 15:35:13 GMT
It's no more or less disrespectful than some employees that have lost their job by his hand, and subsequently litigated against the club because of him. Please provide details and names of all these litigation cases. I find it strange that if they did happen, none of them has found its way into the public domain. Not without their permission, no. I find it strange after years of club operations, the litigation and subsequent settlements has only occurred under TG directorship. |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Mar 20, 2024 15:35:30 GMT
He's cost the club a lot of money in mishandling sacking decent people at the club over his period as CEO ably assisted my Morticia and getting all the HR facts wrong in the cases. Bullying and threats towards former employees are not what the people who he smarms could ever imagine is the same man. Please provide evidence to back up your claims. |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Mar 20, 2024 15:39:43 GMT
Please provide details and names of all these litigation cases. I find it strange that if they did happen, none of them has found its way into the public domain. Not without their permission, no. So you know people involved and those same people who told you, have never come out and aired their grievances. to others. That does not sit right straightaway. Just more gaschat speculation on your part with not a shred of evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 15:46:44 GMT
Not without their permission, no. So you know people involved and those same people who told you, have never come out and aired their grievances. to others. That does not sit right straightaway. Just more gaschat speculation on your part with not a shred of evidence. If you say so. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist or never happened just because certain information isn't easily in the public domain. If you conduct your own research, only a little, the truth will be forthcoming. |
|
|
|
Post by DrFaustus on Mar 20, 2024 15:56:51 GMT
So you know people involved and those same people who told you, have never come out and aired their grievances. to others. That does not sit right straightaway. Just more gaschat speculation on your part with not a shred of evidence. If you say so. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist or never happened just because certain information isn't easily in the public domain. If you conduct your own research, only a little, the truth will be forthcoming. Fair enough. You should write about it in your programme article. Get it to a wider audience? |
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Mar 20, 2024 15:59:33 GMT
So you know people involved and those same people who told you, have never come out and aired their grievances. to others. That does not sit right straightaway. Just more gaschat speculation on your part with not a shred of evidence. If you say so. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist or never happened just because certain information isn't easily in the public domain. If you conduct your own research, only a little, the truth will be forthcoming.If this is the case, why not put it on here? The only reference I have ever found, (apart from the Sainsbury's fiasco), is Ian Atkins v Bristol Rovers. |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Mar 20, 2024 16:07:42 GMT
If you say so. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist or never happened just because certain information isn't easily in the public domain. If you conduct your own research, only a little, the truth will be forthcoming.If this is the case, why not put it on here? The only reference I have ever found, (apart from the Sainsbury's fiasco), is Ian Atkins v Bristol Rovers. The only one I can remember Tilly was a former catering manager who was dismissed for being on the take from suppliers. |
|
|
|
Post by purdownpoacher1 on Mar 20, 2024 16:44:21 GMT
I remember that one 🤔💙
|
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 17:16:14 GMT
If you say so. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist or never happened just because certain information isn't easily in the public domain. If you conduct your own research, only a little, the truth will be forthcoming. Fair enough. You should write about it in your programme article. Get it to a wider audience? Hahaha! 😂🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by vaughan on Mar 20, 2024 18:15:26 GMT
So 4 pages because the guy who told the OP got it wrong then?
He is still employed as CEO. Fact.
He is still a free citizen. Fact.
He has tried his level best whilst employed by the Club. Fact.
He has great affinity for Rovers. Fact.
He doesn't please 100% of the fan base and never will...as someone could always do his job better...
|
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 18:41:31 GMT
So 4 pages because the guy who told the OP got it wrong then? He is still employed as CEO. Fact. He is still a free citizen. Fact. He has tried his level best whilst employed by the Club. Fact. He has great affinity for Rovers. Fact. He doesn't please 100% of the fan base and never will...as someone could always do his job better... Much respect but some of that post is opinion, not fact. Tried his level best? No one can ever know that apart from the man himself. A few here can point out mistakes and issues that have led on to costing the club more time and money to rectify. Affinity? That implies a natural leaning towards Rovers... he's only here for the beer. His natural leaning was always Brighton and Hove Albion and when last in his company, some of his family had season tickets. When the policy is to outsource, invariably the affinity to a club is sometimes compromised. It's the first time we've experienced this on a wholesale basis - of course there is still a skeleton staff employed at the club - but even Brighty, the most nepotistic of appointments has jumped ship. A while back. Like you said no one will ever please 100% of fanbase, which is a good point, but I think he could do better and more: Just his idea of policy of cashless Mem has marginalised a few to say the least. It's obvious this was factored in to the decision, and it appears he doesn't care. So he hasn't tried his level best. Or have affinity with Rovers. He's made decisions that appear to negate this, and litigations against our club, some of the like have never been heard before, not including unilateral change of the club badge before outcry, sponsorship deals messed up, the lack of 1883 club and eroding it's value, blue diamond having to host somewhere other than the mem because of 'costs' lead me to think quite the opposite of some of the more positive posts here. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 20, 2024 18:49:24 GMT
So 4 pages because the guy who told the OP got it wrong then? He is still employed as CEO. Fact. He is still a free citizen. Fact. He has tried his level best whilst employed by the Club. Fact. He has great affinity for Rovers. Fact. He doesn't please 100% of the fan base and never will...as someone could always do his job better... Much respect but some of that post is opinion, not fact. Tried his level best? No one can ever know that apart from the man himself. A few here can point out mistakes and issues that have led on to costing the club more time and money to rectify. Affinity? That implies a natural leaning towards Rovers... he's only here for the beer. His natural leaning was always Brighton and Hove Albion and when last in his company, some of his family had season tickets. When the policy is to outsource, invariably the affinity to a club is sometimes compromised. It's the first time we've experienced this on a wholesale basis - of course there is still a skeleton staff employed at the club - but even Brighty, the most nepotistic of appointments has jumped ship. A while back. Like you said no one will ever please 100% of fanbase, which is a good point, but I think he could do better and more: Just his idea of policy of cashless Mem has marginalised a few to say the least. It's obvious this was factored in to the decision, and it appears he doesn't care. So he hasn't tried his level best. Or have affinity with Rovers. He's made decisions that appear to negate this, and litigations against our club, some of the like have never been heard before, not including unilateral change of the club badge before outcry, sponsorship deals messed up, the lack of 1883 club and eroding it's value, blue diamond having to host somewhere other than the mem because of 'costs' lead me to think quite the opposite of some of the more positive posts here. It seems to me there is more likelihood of Vaughan’s points being correct than there is evidence to support these alleged multiple litigations, which at the moment, come across as made up I’m afraid. |
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 19:02:36 GMT
Much respect but some of that post is opinion, not fact. Tried his level best? No one can ever know that apart from the man himself. A few here can point out mistakes and issues that have led on to costing the club more time and money to rectify. Affinity? That implies a natural leaning towards Rovers... he's only here for the beer. His natural leaning was always Brighton and Hove Albion and when last in his company, some of his family had season tickets. When the policy is to outsource, invariably the affinity to a club is sometimes compromised. It's the first time we've experienced this on a wholesale basis - of course there is still a skeleton staff employed at the club - but even Brighty, the most nepotistic of appointments has jumped ship. A while back. Like you said no one will ever please 100% of fanbase, which is a good point, but I think he could do better and more: Just his idea of policy of cashless Mem has marginalised a few to say the least. It's obvious this was factored in to the decision, and it appears he doesn't care. So he hasn't tried his level best. Or have affinity with Rovers. He's made decisions that appear to negate this, and litigations against our club, some of the like have never been heard before, not including unilateral change of the club badge before outcry, sponsorship deals messed up, the lack of 1883 club and eroding it's value, blue diamond having to host somewhere other than the mem because of 'costs' lead me to think quite the opposite of some of the more positive posts here. It seems to me there is more likelihood of Vaughan’s points being correct than there is evidence to support these alleged multiple litigations, which at the moment, come across as made up I’m afraid. No need to be afraid, e... That's what forums are all about, and it matters not how misguided we all are here, some more than others but you form your opinions your way. And likewise, I will do mine. |
|
|
|
Post by banjogas on Mar 20, 2024 19:05:56 GMT
Vaughan are you related to TG?
Where do we start?
South stand planning debacle
Ticket pricing disparity
Axed competent long serving employees.
Can’t retain his acquaintances he recruited from South Wales.
JCH transfer failure.
Oversaw a transfer policy of signing injury prone players.
Has F-all affiliation to the club or Bristol, lives in Wales and follows Brighton.
Oversaw the ‘redeveloped’ clubhouse and bars which brings in no non match day revenue.
I don’t think there will be many sad to see him go.
It’s been pretty obvious the new owners son is running the club.
|
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 20, 2024 19:14:54 GMT
Queen night fiasco.
Some suppliers not paid they had to threaten court action.
Some suppliers that helped through relegation out of league, COVID and really hard times just dropped.
3 course carvery meals in hospitality that were a shining example and flagship of the club now dropped and majorly expensive.
Shirt sponsorship not full. When has this ever happened? Even the FFS don't bother with this and above before being disbanded.
And.....no flipping big TV!
It's a disgrace!
Especially the TV bit...
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 20, 2024 19:18:12 GMT
Vaughan are you related to TG? Where do we start? South stand planning debacle Ticket pricing disparity Axed competent long serving employees. Can’t retain his acquaintances he recruited from South Wales. JCH transfer failure. Oversaw a transfer policy of signing injury prone players. Has F-all affiliation to the club or Bristol, lives in Wales and follows Brighton. Oversaw the ‘redeveloped’ clubhouse and bars which brings in no non match day revenue. I don’t think there will be many sad to see him go. It’s been pretty obvious the new owners son is running the club. Haven’t some of those overlapped with or happened since the new owner came in - if so and the owners son is running the club doesn’t he have to take the blame for failures on his watch? If TG does leave will he still be a scapegoat for failings in 5, 10 or 15 years time? TG has made mistakes and wouldn’t that be expected for a young CEO in his first job in such a position. Overall I’d say the club is in a better place now than when he joined. |
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Mar 20, 2024 19:56:02 GMT
Amusing that David Bright seems to have gone from zero to hero, in order to fit into the anti-TG agenda. At the time, DB was seen as being responsible for some of the cock-ups which are now being laid at TG's door, and people couldn't wait to get rid of him. Nowt so fickle as us football fans!  |
|
