|
|
Post by gasify on Apr 5, 2024 13:37:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Apr 5, 2024 14:10:44 GMT
Thought the second article didn't have much substance. The bartender was outside and saw the woman punch the horse, and was then inside to witness her coming in to finish her drink. Surely there would have been cctv inside and outside the pub? |
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Apr 5, 2024 14:39:48 GMT
Thought the second article didn't have much substance. The bartender was outside and saw the woman punch the horse, and was then inside to witness her coming in to finish her drink. Surely there would have been cctv inside and outside the pub? Great stuff, so we still only have one horse puncher. Phew! |
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 5, 2024 15:02:55 GMT
Thought the second article didn't have much substance. The bartender was outside and saw the woman punch the horse, and was then inside to witness her coming in to finish her drink. Surely there would have been cctv inside and outside the pub? Great stuff, so we still only have one horse puncher. Phew! But I bet every club has at least one of most unpleasant things. Doesn’t define me or most others on here. The whole argument is rather like that of “my dad could beat your dad….”. UTG! |
|
|
|
Post by orgasmic on Apr 5, 2024 19:57:25 GMT
My claim was actually that gender ideology has its roots deep in paedophilia. We have established you are happy that he at least based his theories on terrible experiments carried out by paedophiles that he then protected. Also by his own admission the data collected to ‘prove’ his theories came from inmates who were in prison for sexual offences (mainly paedophiles). This skewed his data significantly beyond what would be considered scientifically acceptable. This is the basis of the study for the man who coined the term gender is a social construct. The fact that he allowed these experiments to continue, knowing that infants were being molested everyday for his research makes him guilty by joint association as far as I’m concerned. Either way, my claim was that gender has its roots deeply in paedophilia and as you agree his data came from paedophiles that he protected it seems we agree. I'm not Happy about any molestation of children, I'm certainly not. I'm not happy that Bristol has its roots in the Slave trade and that Edward Colston was a disgusting Slave Trader. Your agenda does seem to be Transphobic and this is your way of justifying it to yourself. "Thanks to him, it's now common knowledge that almost all men masturbate, that women peak sexually in their mid-30's and that homosexuality is not some one-in-a-million anomaly." Are you also saying that Homosexuality has its roots deeply in paedophilia? We have gay fans and we have trans fans, let them be. Everyone who has an opinion on something has a justification for how they came to that opinion. So yes, in part, the fact that the person who coined the term gender as a social construct, which underpins the entire ideology engaged with paedophiles to carry out horrific acts on infants, is part of the justification of my opinion. The fact that the data used to back up his claims were deeply flawed also contributes to that justification. There are a great many other factors that also contribute. Kinsey was nothing to do with the roots of homosexuality so his comments are totally irrelevant to this discussion. I’ve noticed that when the facts become uncomfortable you try and shift the narrative slightly! For the record I am not homophobic in the slightest and some of my gay friends are deeply uncomfortable with the trans movement being attached to their community. I also don’t have anything against trans people, I just disagree with their beliefs that they can identify as anything and become that. This isn’t about bashing any of our fans, I’m just disagreeing. I’m also against the movement to push gender ideology on children including physical treatments for transitioning. Of the UK population, only 0.5% identify as trans so to teach it at primary schools seems very much out of context. You could flip your comment about letting people be and say let our children be! |
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Apr 5, 2024 20:06:57 GMT
I'm not Happy about any molestation of children, I'm certainly not. I'm not happy that Bristol has its roots in the Slave trade and that Edward Colston was a disgusting Slave Trader. Your agenda does seem to be Transphobic and this is your way of justifying it to yourself. "Thanks to him, it's now common knowledge that almost all men masturbate, that women peak sexually in their mid-30's and that homosexuality is not some one-in-a-million anomaly." Are you also saying that Homosexuality has its roots deeply in paedophilia? We have gay fans and we have trans fans, let them be. Everyone who has an opinion on something has a justification for how they came to that opinion. So yes, in part, the fact that the person who coined the term gender as a social construct, which underpins the entire ideology engaged with paedophiles to carry out horrific acts on infants, is part of the justification of my opinion. The fact that the data used to back up his claims were deeply flawed also contributes to that justification. There are a great many other factors that also contribute. Kinsey was nothing to do with the roots of homosexuality so his comments are totally irrelevant to this discussion. I’ve noticed that when the facts become uncomfortable you try and shift the narrative slightly! For the record I am not homophobic in the slightest and some of my gay friends are deeply uncomfortable with the trans movement being attached to their community. I also don’t have anything against trans people, I just disagree with their beliefs that they can identify as anything and become that. This isn’t about bashing any of our fans, I’m just disagreeing. I’m also against the movement to push gender ideology on children including physical treatments for transitioning. Of the UK population, only 0.5% identify as trans so to teach it at primary schools seems very much out of context. You could flip your comment about letting people be and say let our children be! Teaching it at Primary Schools, or indeed any classroom or school. Could you point me to where "gender ideology" is part of any curriculum and approved to be on the qualification credit framework (QCF)? Anywhere at all? |
|
|
|
Post by orgasmic on Apr 5, 2024 20:20:45 GMT
Everyone who has an opinion on something has a justification for how they came to that opinion. So yes, in part, the fact that the person who coined the term gender as a social construct, which underpins the entire ideology engaged with paedophiles to carry out horrific acts on infants, is part of the justification of my opinion. The fact that the data used to back up his claims were deeply flawed also contributes to that justification. There are a great many other factors that also contribute. Kinsey was nothing to do with the roots of homosexuality so his comments are totally irrelevant to this discussion. I’ve noticed that when the facts become uncomfortable you try and shift the narrative slightly! For the record I am not homophobic in the slightest and some of my gay friends are deeply uncomfortable with the trans movement being attached to their community. I also don’t have anything against trans people, I just disagree with their beliefs that they can identify as anything and become that. This isn’t about bashing any of our fans, I’m just disagreeing. I’m also against the movement to push gender ideology on children including physical treatments for transitioning. Of the UK population, only 0.5% identify as trans so to teach it at primary schools seems very much out of context. You could flip your comment about letting people be and say let our children be! Teaching it at Primary Schools, or indeed any classroom or school. Could you point me to where "gender ideology" is part of any curriculum and approved to be on the qualification credit framework (QCF)? Anywhere at all? I cannot. I can say that my son was taught about it at his primary school though. |
|
