Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:32:55 GMT
I haven't seen any meltdown to be fair,still all to play for and looking certs for playoffs.
So much better than our usual L2 campainges.
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 28, 2016 16:33:59 GMT
How the f**k was that defensive? 442 with 2 attacking wingers. Again with your moronic agenda. Parkes for Leadbitter was a defensive change..I said that change was needless.If you disagree, may be I am not the . Give it a rest Tbone. When you go on and on about stuff in the middle of a mixed run of results you just look like a troll or an ADHD sufferer with his own internet connection, that we kinda feel sorry for. But when you do it straight after a loss like this, you just look like a lady garden. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Mar 28, 2016 16:35:54 GMT
DC changes a winning side and we lose. Meltdown. DC changes a winning side and we win. Nothing. It's just one person really who finds it funny to talk sh** constantly. |
|
|
|
Post by cradengas on Mar 28, 2016 16:36:54 GMT
Parkes didn't play last Friday due to the birth of his daughter, secondly he was put in to deal with any "direct, route one" balls that McChrystal didn't deal with we were let down in midfield imo We don't have anyone in midfield to do the closing down (as we have no Sinclair and Clarke was taken off). Lines and Lawrence in midfield is ok going forward but will never work as a defensive unit, it was disappointing to see Montano taken off as a lot of people have commented on his defensive contribution recently. Clarke was on when the 1st goal was scored but could have been taken off because he was not 100% fit from the knock he took on friday but yes you are right. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:37:20 GMT
Thinking about it, I think we can still get 5 wins from the remaining 7. That could be enough.
Winning against Crawley could inspire another run, but I think if we drop points on Saturday it'll be very difficult to pull it back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raj Gas on Mar 28, 2016 16:37:57 GMT
I think Tbone has a point because after Friday most Managers would have left their side as it was. Danny certainly didn't deserve to be dropped and we have in the end worried about a lower team than let them worry about us which can be construed to being defensive.It's disappointing because they clearly were not on that good a run and that's what concerns me about now having to play so many teams at the bottom as we are almost a "cup-final" to some. Kinda weird thing to say of a manager who had just won 6 games straight using the philosophy of a squad system, changing the team to suit the opposition. But a back 4 (missing it's best player) who didn't concede against a Cambridge side who were equally as direct and it worked. I don't think changing players every game works, I know we were 3rd but we have also lost the most games up top and with so many teams still in the mix I would have left things as they were today. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Mar 28, 2016 16:38:28 GMT
Thinking about it, I think we can still get 5 wins from the remaining 7. That could be enough. Winning against Crawley could inspire another run, but I think if we drop points on Saturday it'll be very difficult to pull it back. Saturday is very important now, I expect us to win. |
|
|
|
Post by cradengas on Mar 28, 2016 16:38:42 GMT
Thinking about it, I think we can still get 5 wins from the remaining 7. That could be enough. Winning against Crawley could inspire another run, but I think if we drop points on Saturday it'll be very difficult to pull it back. True and with Northampton drawing with Mansfield shows they aren't exactly unbeatable. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:38:46 GMT
Is this TBONE bloke for real? If you are the same Yategas that used to be chummy with the glory hunting knowall,you know that I am real.Now any more silly questions? |
|
|
|
Post by rocknrollaayatollah on Mar 28, 2016 16:38:49 GMT
DC changes a winning side and we lose. Meltdown. DC changes a winning side and we win. Nothing. It's just one person really who finds it funny to talk sh** constantly. I was just thinking that actually. The forum isn't in meltdown, just one poster making me have a meltdown. |
|
|
|
Post by paulpirate on Mar 28, 2016 16:40:20 GMT
No need to panic,we can go on another run no problem
Northampton have taken there foot off the gas as well they will just stroll over line
Them and Exeter will be the toughest games but still rkn were beat Exeter and get a draw at cobblers
I rkn mccristal is the weakest link and his passing is terrible,glad locks is back to steady the pirate ship to promotion
Keep your heads up gas it's still on,more worried about Accy than Plymouth tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 28, 2016 16:40:44 GMT
Kinda weird thing to say of a manager who had just won 6 games straight using the philosophy of a squad system, changing the team to suit the opposition. But a back 4 (missing it's best player) who didn't concede against a Cambridge side who were equally as direct and it worked. I don't think changing players every game works, I know we were 3rd but we have also lost the most games up top and with so many teams still in the mix I would have left things as they were today. Well, it seems pretty obvious to me that it does work for DC. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:41:07 GMT
Well. Now I've calmed down:
Positives:
-Scored 2 more.
-Lockyer is back next game.
-Easier run-in than Plymouth.
-The pressure of keeping the winning run going is gone for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 28, 2016 16:45:13 GMT
FFS play a different record, where were you when we were winning 6 games on the bounce?? Anyway how could starting with Montano in the team be too defensive? No. You play a different record. Leadbitter was one of our best players on Friday.He should not have been left out for Parkes. You know that as well as I do. He wasn't, he was left out for Clarke, unless Parkes was playing LB and nobody told him, perhaps that why we conceded 3 goals? At the end of the day DC's got us to 3rd by his decision making, whether you think he's clueless or which is more than most of us are ever capable of doing. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:46:06 GMT
Now that my 100% match thread record is over, someone else can do the honours on Saturday.
|
|
|
|
Post by toddy1953 on Mar 28, 2016 16:46:18 GMT
I think Tbone has a point because after Friday most Managers would have left their side as it was. Danny certainly didn't deserve to be dropped and we have in the end worried about a lower team than let them worry about us which can be construed to being defensive.It's disappointing because they clearly were not on that good a run and that's what concerns me about now having to play so many teams at the bottom as we are almost a "cup-final" to some. I think Tbone is just doing his best to be as negative as he can. Most Managers would not have us in a position to be pushing top 7 let alone the automatics, so I for one will support his decisions, yes he will get some wrong but so what, anything above mid table this season is a bonus. Leds didn't deserve to be dropped but it's a squad game, we looked shakey in the middle of defence against Cambridge, so I think DC wanted us more solid there & brought Parkes back in. it amazes me that every time we lose, some on here pop up with comments about selection as if they know the players & standard of their fitness inside out & think they could Manage the team from the comfort of the key board. Yes it was disappointing we lost today but I guarantee whatever the formation and personnel we will lose some games, we move on go again on Sat, UTG |
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Mar 28, 2016 16:46:58 GMT
I think we should have had this one postponed as some of the other clubs have done. We certainly missed Lockyear. Both Mc Crystal and Parkes manage to commit a few slip ups in the game, and lets remember they were our preferred pairing when we went down. I also think Clarke made his changes too soon in the game. For me we lacked midfield bite, and this was only worse after the change. Couldn't have it postponed McBurnie doesn't count towards the 3 players because he is an emergency loan That's bollox really isn't it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2016 16:48:16 GMT
We were going to lose a game at some stage.
Even if we'd have drawn, it would be negative on here.
There are a few twists yet and it is going to go to the wire.
We have been on a fantastic run which has pretty much given us a play-off place.
|
|
|
|
Post by madgas on Mar 28, 2016 16:48:16 GMT
We can still go up automatically, Regardless we must fight for 4th/5th home in the second leg is big advantage.
|
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Mar 28, 2016 16:48:31 GMT
I think Tbone has a point because after Friday most Managers would have left their side as it was. Danny certainly didn't deserve to be dropped and we have in the end worried about a lower team than let them worry about us which can be construed to being defensive.It's disappointing because they clearly were not on that good a run and that's what concerns me about now having to play so many teams at the bottom as we are almost a "cup-final" to some. I think Tbone is just doing his best to be as negative as he can. Most Managers would not have us in a position to be pushing top 7 let alone the automatics, so I for one will support his decisions, yes he will get some wrong but so what, anything above mid table this season is a bonus. Leds didn't deserve to be dropped but it's a squad game, we looked shakey in the middle of defence against Cambridge, so I think DC wanted us more solid there & brought Parkes back in. it amazes me that every time we lose, some on here pop up with comments about selection as if they know the players & standard of their fitness inside out & think they could Manage the team from the comfort of the key board. Yes it was disappointing we lost today but I guarantee whatever the formation and personnel we will lose some games, we move on go again on Sat, UTG I think we should stick to 4-4-2 at home, but away, for at least the first half it would be 5-3-2 |
|
