|
|
Post by gasincider on Jun 11, 2016 13:00:00 GMT
BSS has just tweeted confirmation.
Good one Mr chairman.
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jun 11, 2016 13:05:00 GMT
Fair play.
That will gain him another two weeks grace with those who are dying to find something wrong with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by eastongas on Jun 11, 2016 13:06:20 GMT
Good news.
Be interesting to see how many clubs voted in favour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 11, 2016 13:12:57 GMT
I assume at least 51% did!
|
|
|
|
Post by You can call me Al. on Jun 11, 2016 13:17:35 GMT
At least they're soddin talking again then!  |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 11, 2016 13:23:23 GMT
At least they're soddin talking again then! Only via email/text as BSS had to ask SH which way he voted before confirming his stance!! |
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Jun 11, 2016 15:02:38 GMT
Delighted to hear the he voted against. I would have been very very disappointed otherwise. Disgusting decision overall by the football league to allow this to happen.
And how did the threshold go from 90% to 50%? Money talks I suppose, but it sickens me that the spirit of competition is dying in this sport.
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jun 11, 2016 15:09:40 GMT
And how did the threshold go from 90% to 50%? Money talks I suppose, but it sickens me that the spirit of competition is dying in this sport. I'm guessing Dam with the league system and adding more teams, etc, needs the massive majority, whereas more run of the mill rulings, like running their second cup competition doesn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2016 15:10:18 GMT
Good on Steve Hamer.
Wonder which clubs did vote for it?
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jun 11, 2016 16:45:57 GMT
Sack the board. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 11, 2016 16:49:39 GMT
Delighted to hear the he voted against. I would have been very very disappointed otherwise. Disgusting decision overall by the football league to allow this to happen. And how did the threshold go from 90% to 50%? Money talks I suppose, but it sickens me that the spirit of competition is dying in this sport. We all know only the premier league counts these days to the bellends in power, shame the championship,l1,l2 and maybe the conference couldn't breakaway and form the alternative fa ,and restore the old d1-4 system |
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Jun 11, 2016 16:52:35 GMT
I also would love to see who voted for this nonsense. I've only seen clubs that voted against named.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 11, 2016 16:58:38 GMT
I also would love to see who voted for this nonsense. I've only seen clubs that voted against named. Plus what they hope to gain by there decision? |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 11, 2016 17:00:22 GMT
I also would love to see who voted for this nonsense. I've only seen clubs that voted against named. then surely the ones who arn't named will be the one who voted for(ish)  |
|
nsgas
Reserve Team
Posts: 209
|
Post by nsgas on Jun 11, 2016 17:09:49 GMT
I also would love to see who voted for this nonsense. I've only seen clubs that voted against named. I won't be surprised if we end up with a majority of Chairmen claiming that they voted against something as unpopular as this. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2016 19:58:16 GMT
What the club tell us and how they actually voted 'may' be 2 very different things.
If they did vote in favour they could never own up to it after seeing fans reactions, and silence would more of less give the impression we voted for it when fans start asking for a statement on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jun 11, 2016 20:22:29 GMT
The teams that voted against were:- Oxford, Hartlepool, Portsmouth, Port Vale, Accrington Stanley, Luton, Wimbledon and Bristol Rovers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2016 20:22:55 GMT
BSS has just tweeted confirmation. Good for him Bound to be true then. The man who stayed silent and said nothing on important matters the past few years has tweeted that Rovers voted NO to allow premiership teams in a worthless competition nobody gives a toss about and its time to tug one off! What is this world we live in again? Never never land? |
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Jun 11, 2016 20:56:59 GMT
BSS has just tweeted confirmation. Good for him Bound to be true then. The man who stayed silent and said nothing on important matters the past few years has tweeted that Rovers voted NO to allow premiership teams in a worthless competition nobody gives a toss about and its time to tug one off! What is this world we live in again? Never never land? Would you give it a rest! The man confirmed it was true which was backed up by a number of people on Twitter, Why would he lie? he is supposed to represent us not lie to us, Isn't it a good thing that rovers have voted against B teams?, not sure what your point is. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2016 21:25:18 GMT
Bound to be true then. The man who stayed silent and said nothing on important matters the past few years has tweeted that Rovers voted NO to allow premiership teams in a worthless competition nobody gives a toss about and its time to tug one off! What is this world we live in again? Never never land? Would you give it a rest! The man confirmed it was true which was backed up by a number of people on Twitter, Why would he lie? he is supposed to represent us not lie to us, Isn't it a good thing that rovers have voted against B teams?, not sure what your point is. Give what a rest? I gave what I'm I titled to do on here just like you..give an opinion. The point is it's a worthless cup until Wembley,or if we play City in the semi final!! It's a storm in a tea cup,nothing more. You say he is supposed to represent us. At what? Tiddlywinks? He will say what he is told and not until his strings are pulled. |
|
