|
Post by cj on Dec 3, 2020 13:04:54 GMT
We have already reached our 23 player squad limit.
In order for PT to bring in what people have been saying is needed, which is some experience, some leaders and some much needed strikers, we will need to let go some of those players from the squad of 23.
So who should PT let go to make room for his new signings?
|
|
|
Post by bluebiro on Dec 3, 2020 13:18:16 GMT
Harries Kelly grant Westbrook Lawson baldwin Would also send otzumer back in jan Just can't see him getting much game time in a 442 if the centre midfield has to stop being a soft centre
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Dec 3, 2020 13:20:55 GMT
Michael Kelly would be the obvious candidate, not featured at all so far this season. Cameron Hargreaves has barely got a look in either so it might be best for him if he gets some game time out on loan.
I really hope that Ogogo is recalled in January, an obvious upgrade over Upson and Grant and would bring the sort of energy and determination that is needed in a relegation scrap.
|
|
|
Post by Qatar Gas on Dec 3, 2020 13:24:36 GMT
It’s not even a case of who leaves, an under contract player isn’t likely to leave willingly unless they can get the same deal or better elsewhere. Of course you can just un register them in January. If JML isn’t going to even make the bench we might as well send him back to Derby. Then there’s players like Kelly who are extremely unlikely to even make the bench again this season but would they want to leave?
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Dec 3, 2020 13:24:46 GMT
Tutonda Hargreaves Kelly Barrett liddle Rodman Davies walker little maybe a few others . I don't see us having a problem reducing our squad . The problem is how quick ? How much ? When ?
We need two strikers asap..
|
|
|
Post by toddy1953 on Dec 3, 2020 13:37:31 GMT
We have already reached our 23 player squad limit.
In order for PT to bring in what people have been saying is needed, which is some experience, some leaders and some much needed strikers, we will need to let go some of those players from the squad of 23.
So who should PT let go to make room for his new signings?
Not sure if we can break loan agreements or cancel contracts so maybe watering into the wind with this one, but assuming there was no issue with this, then I would ship out..... Baldwin Harries Tutonda Grant Kelly Little JML. Westbrook Ehmer both need to shape up or be shipped out. I like Barrett but apart from the perceived weight issue, if he ain’t doing enough to to even make the bench, then he needs to go. I’ve lost count over the years where people say we are one or two players short of a good team. Now......... Good Luck Paul Tisdale.
|
|
|
Post by hollyhillgas on Dec 3, 2020 13:50:16 GMT
Nobody will want them, on the other hand Nicholson, Daley and Jaakkola would fetch money.
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Dec 3, 2020 13:58:32 GMT
Christ Hollyhillgas, What are you suggesting doing...relegate us for certain? There are lots of candidates of players who are not getting a look in but I would try to get rid of Upson, Harries, Kelly, Little,JML, Leahey and everyone needs to shape up.They are all as bad as one another at the moment. Otzumer, Nicholson ,Annsi, Hanlan,Daly are the chinks of light!!
|
|
|
Post by TAGas on Dec 3, 2020 14:04:05 GMT
How long as Leahy got left on his contract?
He needs to go imo and especially if we play a 4-4-2. Can't defend to save his life.
Upson, Barrett, Bennett, Harries and Kelly id get rid of Grant and Westbrooke too if it was possible but that won't happen.
I would also bring Ogogo back even for just character in the dressing room.
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Dec 3, 2020 14:04:36 GMT
It's how soon and what teams will pay . We might have to wait to mid/ late January for an outgoing loan.
This is why the cup money (if approved) can be used on wages as soon as possible or just after January 1st.
|
|
|
Post by albaron on Dec 3, 2020 14:39:28 GMT
Christ Hollyhillgas, What are you suggesting doing...relegate us for certain? There are lots of candidates of players who are not getting a look in but I would try to get rid of Upson, Harries, Kelly, Little,JML, Leahey and everyone needs to shape up.They are all as bad as one another at the moment. Otzumer, Nicholson ,Annsi, Hanlan,Daly are the chinks of light!! This is the post i agree with. I'd also get rid of the Dutch goalkeeper. With regards to bringing others back forget it. They left for a reason and only Clarke - Harris has gone on to a higher club.
|
|
|
Post by bluebiro on Dec 3, 2020 14:50:53 GMT
Would also try to offload the youth coach from Chelsea garner brought here. Get cureton in as an striker coach.
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Dec 3, 2020 14:55:23 GMT
Would also try to offload the youth coach from Chelsea garner brought here. Get cureton in as an striker coach. I never understand this approach, people wanting a "coach" based on nothing other that he popped a few in during his career...
|
|
|
Post by kampucheagas on Dec 3, 2020 14:56:55 GMT
Sums us up that the young technical players we all got excited about are now being lined up by supporters to get rid of!
I don’t think a wholesale clear out is possible so I’d look to try and sell Kelly and send back JML.
We need Rodman and Little to stay fit once back and sign an experienced striker in Jan
Tisdales job is to work out what best he can get out of what he’s got.....personally I don’t see enough quality in the back line to be hopeful. We look like conceding every time the ball comes into the box. We are slow and predictable.
And this with a squad of endless centre backs and left backs!
Just hope we can stay in the mix til Jan and not be cut adrift because we have played some seriously poor teams over the last month and not beaten any of them!
|
|
|
Post by cj on Dec 3, 2020 15:10:28 GMT
At the end of the day, if we can't send loans back, if no one wants to sign our players for a fee or even for free or even on loan then we are stuck with what we have. We will only be able to bring in U21 players which won't fit the 'experience' or 'leader' that will be needed to get us out of this mess. If we want experience and leaders then we need to somehow let players go. If we want a striker or 2 (and I am sure we don't anymore youngsters now) then we need to somehow let players go. We need to be ready at the start of the window to do our business of in's and out's and try not to leave it all to the 11th hour of the final day, so we don't waste more games during the window and leave us less games to try to survive.
We could go down the road of unregistering players from the 23 squad to register any new players. But do we have the wage budget available to do this?
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Dec 3, 2020 15:22:40 GMT
At the end of the day, if we can't send loans back, if no one wants to sign our players for a fee or even for free or even on loan then we are stuck with what we have. We will only be able to bring in U21 players which won't fit the 'experience' or 'leader' that will be needed to get us out of this mess. If we want experience and leaders then we need to somehow let players go. If we want a striker or 2 (and I am sure we don't anymore youngsters now) then we need to somehow let players go. We need to be ready at the start of the window to do our business of in's and out's and try not to leave it all to the 11th hour of the final day, so we don't waste more games during the window and leave us less games to try to survive.
We could go down the road of unregistering players from the 23 squad to register any new players. But do we have the wage budget available to do this?
That is real possibility . But if we can use some of the cup run money on wages . Then it allows a striker or two . The EFl may allow 50% of our 120k to be spent . We await confirmation on ' additional income ' which I think clubs should be able to use . Afterall we risk players and pay out extra expenses for every extra game ..
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Dec 3, 2020 15:32:16 GMT
There’s another point of view here I would like people to consider.
This team are very green and inexperienced but many say they can see the technical ability.
Like any job, once you’ve done a week it’s all new. Once you’ve done it a month, it’s less new. 3 months in, and you’re getting to know it better.
There is a good chance some of these players will go on a curve upwards once they have 20 games under their belt.
I think we definitely need experience but crucially, some physicality. We are too small and weak as a team. Hanlan is our “big guy” in the opponents part of the pitch, and he isn’t a “big guy”
The most notable thing I’ve noticed all year is that the opposition can play the ball to their strikers and advanced midfield players, and 2 of them can hold off 5 of ours while their midfield and wing backs catch up the play.
Conversely, as soon as we face somewhat of an organised defence, we cannot play through them, because all our players cannot hold off anyone. We can only ever look good in a breakaway or with space to run at them and play.
I am not sure it’s experience we lack, I think it’s physicality. That often comes with your late 20s as a footballer.
2 strong strikers, and 2 physically strong midfields for me. I think you’ll see a massive difference with just one or 2 people in forward positions who can hold players off and give what we DO have - players who can use the ball, a chance to get their head up and pick some passes.
Bottom line for me is we aren’t poor because we lack experience per se (although it’s a factor), we are weak because our young players can’t compete with guys 5-10 years older and a stone or more stronger.
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Dec 3, 2020 15:33:44 GMT
Its £40k we made on EFL cup . 20 k participation . Plus 5 k draws X 2 and 10k on winning . Total 40k
Fa cup . 42 k plus 37 k TV money . Plus 1st round highlights.
Total £ 120k..
A Micky mouse win next week banks another 20k plus a possible TV red button v Sheffield ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2020 15:40:39 GMT
At the end of the day, if we can't send loans back, if no one wants to sign our players for a fee or even for free or even on loan then we are stuck with what we have. We will only be able to bring in U21 players which won't fit the 'experience' or 'leader' that will be needed to get us out of this mess. If we want experience and leaders then we need to somehow let players go. If we want a striker or 2 (and I am sure we don't anymore youngsters now) then we need to somehow let players go. We need to be ready at the start of the window to do our business of in's and out's and try not to leave it all to the 11th hour of the final day, so we don't waste more games during the window and leave us less games to try to survive.
We could go down the road of unregistering players from the 23 squad to register any new players. But do we have the wage budget available to do this?
Probably not, so sadly this whole thread seems a bit moot to me. Let’s look at the evidence: the sheer number of players we have on our books must surely indicate we are somewhere near the limit of our budget. I’ll be flabbergasted if we don’t need to let players go to bring some in. Unless our league table improves who will want players who, at the very least, are out of form playing for a team in relegation trouble? Tisdale probably has to try and turn this lot into winners somehow. The only possible wriggle room I can see is maybe de-registering some, bringing Ogogo back (if legally allowed) and recalling the youth players from loan because in their short cameos (particularly the Cheltenham game) they showed hunger and determination and a bit of skill. Daly, Nicholson And Ogogo would be a decent spine. God knows what to do about the defence though, that looked to be absolutely buggered however you slice it.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Dec 3, 2020 15:44:48 GMT
There’s another point of view here I would like people to consider. This team are very green and inexperienced but many say they can see the technical ability. Like any job, once you’ve done a week it’s all new. Once you’ve done it a month, it’s less new. 3 months in, and you’re getting to know it better. There is a good chance some of these players will go on a curve upwards once they have 20 games under their belt. I think we definitely need experience but crucially, some physicality. We are too small and weak as a team. Hanlan is our “big guy” in the opponents part of the pitch, and he isn’t a “big guy” The most notable thing I’ve noticed all year is that the opposition can play the ball to their strikers and advanced midfield players, and 2 of them can hold off 5 of ours while their midfield and wing backs catch up the play. Conversely, as soon as we face somewhat of an organised defence, we cannot play through them, because all our players cannot hold off anyone. We can only ever look good in a breakaway or with space to run at them and play. I am not sure it’s experience we lack, I think it’s physicality. That often comes with your late 20s as a footballer. 2 strong strikers, and 2 physically strong midfields for me. I think you’ll see a massive difference with just one or 2 people in forward positions who can hold players off and give what we DO have - players who can use the ball, a chance to get their head up and pick some passes. Bottom line for me is we aren’t poor because we lack experience per se (although it’s a factor), we are weak because our young players can’t compete with guys 5-10 years older and a stone or more stronger. I agree ☝️
|
|