|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 31, 2022 11:09:00 GMT
It's a short clip, so how would you know it's not role play?? Never used a safe word before?? Not saying that's what happened. If it's as it sounded, then he deserves what he gets. Just saying there is more than one option. That clip does not 100% say he's guilty. The full clip might, as a lot was recorded, before that part. Did she know what was going to happen?? Cause she was recording ages before, if she did and he did do it. That suggests it happened before. Need to hear the rest of the clip though. i mean if all there was was an audio clip, the role play argument might be more valid. When you couple it with the photo's it don't look good. Of course it could all have been role play that got a bit out of hand. Didn't Miss Robson post this stuff herself? so saying your phone was hacked whilst not impossible seems less likely. Someone could have hacked her and posted the stuff under her accounts, but surely that would have to be someone who knew her. We will have to see what the facts are and what an investigation brings, but to me it looks like a scared young women who has posted something and has 'regretted' it like many domestic abuse victims Not hard for experts to hack accounts, a lot of people upload photos and videos to online storage. Luckily for us, no one will want to hack ours! But it wouldn't have to be someone they knew. For her sake, I hope they are fake. The truth will come out either way, as they will want the full recordings and want to check the photos etc. He's likely to be guilty, it does not look good. Just saying I think people should wait until it's been confirmed, it is how it seems, before abusing him over the internet.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 31, 2022 10:11:44 GMT
Statement is a bit weird, but then its not exactly uncommon for abused women to recant, blame themselves etc. Maybe Miss Robson is regretting it and this making the hacking up. Who knows. Something has happened. The pics are there and the audio seems pretty legit and not 'role play' It's a short clip, so how would you know it's not role play?? Never used a safe word before?? Not saying that's what happened. If it's as it sounded, then he deserves what he gets. Just saying there is more than one option. That clip does not 100% say he's guilty. The full clip might, as a lot was recorded, before that part. Did she know what was going to happen?? Cause she was recording ages before, if she did and he did do it. That suggests it happened before. Need to hear the rest of the clip though.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 31, 2022 0:38:13 GMT
Has anyone seen the girl's father's statement. Something doesn't quite add up here. I don't know about others on here but if this was my daughter I would be a lot more P?!sed off about it than he sounds! If guilty he deserves all that is coming to him!! But so many in Twitter hanger jumped to conclusions already. If her phone was hacked anything could have happened. Only get a small part of the clip. Could have been role play, for all we know. I'm sure all will come out eventually, whether it's good or bad. Would like to hear the full clip, to see what actually happened.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 30, 2022 18:21:39 GMT
Astonishing, football historians looking for and failing to find any previous instances. Fair plat to the taker who smashed in all 4 where as i have always advocated changing takers after 1! Bit of payback for player concerned who i believe has had some problems in the past. I read today that it was the first time that he scored a penalty during a competitive league game. Had taken one before, last season, which was saved. He was only recently appointed their taker. Plus he was 500/1 to score 3 or more goals!
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 30, 2022 11:51:33 GMT
He had another good game yesterday, although I would have gave man of the match to Taylor who defended well and brought the ball out of defence well. Although Thomas was outstanding at times, his end product wasn't great and her gave it away a few times early on. On one occasion he tried a Hollywood pass from a free kick and gave it straight to them, they had a promising break, but luckily they were rubbish. I just think Taylor was more consistent over the 90 minutes. All this talk about potential new signings. Keeping hold of Thomas and Taylor for the rest of the season will be key. I had a nightmare that Taylor was recalled last night! Hopefully it wasn't a sign! Regarding the Hollywood pass, it seemed a simple pass to one of the CB's to me but for some reason they misread the pass and just left it. As far as his end product, surely that was down to JB only playing with one striker, so Thomas had no choice but to go for goal? Thomas' spell on the highlights where he had 3 shots on goal is probably the best wing play we've seen since Bodin's better days. Just a pity Hoole's red seemed to reduce Thomas'influence on the game. He had a great game, just saying I thought Taylor was better over 90 minutes. Thought Taylor was really good yesterday, especially when we were down to ten men. Lots of fans always give the wingers man of the match, as it's not pleasing to watch. The pass curled to far in front of the centre backs, all player's make mistakes though. The centre back couldn't really run forward onto it, as if they were beaten to it, we would have been in trouble. His chasing down was great and he's looking sharper than ever. Hopefully he will keep improving. It's good debating who had the better game, out of two good player's, rather than moaning about player's😂
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 30, 2022 8:27:06 GMT
He had another good game yesterday, although I would have gave man of the match to Taylor who defended well and brought the ball out of defence well.
Although Thomas was outstanding at times, his end product wasn't great and her gave it away a few times early on. On one occasion he tried a Hollywood pass from a free kick and gave it straight to them, they had a promising break, but luckily they were rubbish.
I just think Taylor was more consistent over the 90 minutes.
All this talk about potential new signings. Keeping hold of Thomas and Taylor for the rest of the season will be key. I had a nightmare that Taylor was recalled last night! Hopefully it wasn't a sign!
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 29, 2022 19:41:29 GMT
See Oxford scored 4 penalties at Gillingham today! What's the most penalties we have had in a game, not including shoot outs?? I can remember us having two in a game before, but no more than that.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 29, 2022 15:58:03 GMT
Am I missing something here, the amount of fouls Walsall to us and we have a player sent off no complaints by me Hoole was stupid and deserved the red in my opinion Probably deserved a 2nd yellow, but I've seen players getting away with that, when booked just before. Not sure if he deserved the first yellow, as we don't know what he said. It did look like it could have been a straight ref to there player though. Plus there player that was booked, caught our player's twice after and got away with it. Seems like any 50/50s regarding cards, go against us.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 29, 2022 11:13:57 GMT
Need to start with Clarke after his short cameo and goal on Tuesday drop Collins to bench. Walsall have signed a Man U youngster left full back. On paper looks a comfortable home win ....but never straight forward Why no ptemier or championship matches this weekend? No match of the day. There are championship matches. One week mini break for Premier League. Supposed to be for a rest, but most clubs have traveled abroad!
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 26, 2022 12:14:03 GMT
On the minus side our mental strength is woeful Not sure about this. Was definitely poor to let in two towards the end due to complacency/sloppiness etc. - but for every night like last night there’s an Oxford in the cup (1-3 down to 4-3 up), Rochdale (pegged back to 2-2 but won it 4-2) & Swindon (1-0 down at 4th in league, equalised and dominated the rest of the game). Would like to see an older head signed this month to help out the defence experience-wise, though. The complacency started from the manager. Thinking the game was won, he put on Pitman, to play alongside Clarke. Neither were going to run the channels, pressure defenders and get back to help out. It invited pressure onto us. Saying that, at that stage, it did look like the game was won and we did manage to get the 3 points just about. So hopefully we can learn from that, without dropping any points in the process. So it could be good that it happened last night, rather than it happening in a different game and costing us points.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 26, 2022 11:45:15 GMT
Can someone tell me about the window, in terms of free agents and loans - usually they arent required by the end of the month and typically i guess thats the market we'll be looking in Loans normally have to be signed before the window closes. Free agents can be signed after.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 25, 2022 22:49:24 GMT
Surely thats the last we'll see of pitman in a rovers shirt. The only time we should bring Pitman on is when we’re losing with a few minutes left and we’ve tried everything else. Bringing him on when we’ve dominated with pace and urgency up top all game with 10 minutes to go is game management suicide because we lost all our movement up front and everything came back at us. But we bossed it for 80 played well for that time scored 3 and should have had 5 or 6 and we won the game. Pitman will have his uses again this season but 3-0 up isn’t the time. Wouldn't have been as bad, if Clarke wasn't already on. But Pitman and Clarke together is asking for trouble.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 25, 2022 10:10:51 GMT
Poster has said tonight was a mistake and meant Tuesday. But could be interesting? Is he not just talking about tonight's game?? Doubt we would receive stadium news on a night. Could be disappointed, been here before - losing to a team near the bottom, when we are expected to win. Fingers crossed that it doesn't happen?? Could mean anything, but on a Tuesday night, when we have a game. I expect he's taking about that.
|
|
|
Wishlist
Jan 24, 2022 12:12:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 24, 2022 12:12:51 GMT
Stuff like this knobs me off. It used to be players would come through the league and if they were good enough end up in the PL. Now the fuckers are even hoovering up all of the talent in non league. Where are we meant to get our players from? Nothing stopping us signing players like Tanner. I first mentioned him on here when he was in the Bromley academy. He was without a club last summer. The key is spotting them early and having a manager willing to give them a chance. Edit: Jayden Wareham (now Chelsea) and Ollie Tanner - gaschat.co.uk/post/621169No disputing your knowledge, but at that stage, no other league club took a chance on him either. For every player that makes it, there are lots that don't. Unfortunately we are not in a position to sign them all up.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 22, 2022 1:04:25 GMT
Nothing to do with our club I don’t believe… clubs are not allowed to show Saturday games on iFollow between certain times (someone said something like between 2.15pm and 5.15pm) due to broadcasting restrictions… as our game is 1pm KO and would still be playing during that window, they aren’t allowed to show it… I think only option could possibly be beam back to the club but financially that would unlikely cover the costs of putting it on and also I think Swindon would have had to agree to it too… Think it's 2.45pm. The 12.30 games always go past 2:15pm. Not 100% though.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 22, 2022 1:00:56 GMT
You have to say, good job done by the "negligent" Garner, who only joined 17 days before the new season with Swindon having only 8 contracted players at the club. Compare that to Barton who had all summer to get it right and left it late in the window to sign 2 strikers with the combined age of nearly 70 and no natural right wing back for a system that relies on the position. Sometimes it's easier with a clean slate. Barton had to get rid of Garners signings before being able to complete his squad. Expect Barton would have preferred to have only 8 player's on the books. Not necessarily a bad thing at this level. We started the season with Hanlon on the books, who we had to move on before we could even think about bringing in a replacement etc
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 21, 2022 15:32:06 GMT
Wasn't he signed when the window was closed?? If so, it was probably him as cover or no one. Why not get the position and cover sorted before the window closed? You would like to think we tried. But after failing, for what ever reason, it meant signing a free agent on a short term deal. Hopefully we get things sorted before the window closes this time.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 21, 2022 15:08:35 GMT
Dunno why we signed him in the first place! Wasn't he signed when the window was closed?? If so, it was probably him as cover or no one.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 19, 2022 9:49:41 GMT
I’d much rather have this bunch of has beens then every single player Barton let go. Wouldn’t swap one of them for Collins Finley Taylor coutts whelan Saunders belshaw Anderson evans. All willing to fight for their teammates til the death and most possess bags of ability. Unlike their predecessors. those players obviously aren't the "has-beens" I'm referring to. Leon Clarke, Brett Pittman and Junior Brown were all dud signings. Coutts I'm still not convinced by. So you would rather have Pittman than Hanlan? Or Brown over Koiki? Last season people moaned we didn't have enough experience, now we have has-beens. You need a balance, yes we signed some older player's, but we brought in some younger player's as well.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 17, 2022 19:54:24 GMT
The times that I watched him last season on iFollow he looked like he had never even played professional football before. Poor positioning and poor distribution. If his agent can get him an upward move, then that agent has performed a miracle. Didn't papers say the same about Kelly when he was with us? Then he couldn't even get a game with us.
|
|