|
|
Post by South Stand Ultra on Jul 19, 2018 17:03:11 GMT
Where do we all stand about naming someone like Cliff Richard before he's even been charged?
Should he be named in the hope other potential victims come forward, or, should his name be kept secret?
Would so many of the taxi drivers victims had come forward if he hadn't been named?
Jimmy Saville?
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Jul 19, 2018 17:45:33 GMT
Anonymity until charges are brought unless there is either (1) a danger to the public (accomplices, etc) or (2) witnesses are required to come forward.
In both cases police will need to go to court and an application to a judge will be required.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2018 18:30:44 GMT
Anonymity until charges are brought unless there is either (1) a danger to the public (accomplices, etc) or (2) witnesses are required to come forward. In both cases police will need to go to court and an application to a judge will be required. Totally agree. I would also take away the right of anonymity when 'alleged' victims are proven to have lied and acted maliciously. Also, the BBC and press are moaning about press freedoms but they take things too far and have no interest in public welfare, public interest etc. If the BBC waste taxpayers money pursuing an appeal against the damages they should be brought to account. The license fee should be withdrawn. When the press go too far and are forced to apologise the apology should be made to fill the same pages and cover as much of those pages as the original story. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 19, 2018 18:55:40 GMT
Unfortunately it has to be anonymous until conviction.
Mud sticks and I bet all of us think he's probably a wrong un despite having never been found guilty of anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jul 19, 2018 18:57:27 GMT
People from a certain community have 100% anonymity when they are accused of heinous crimes involving under age girls and the BBC wouldn't dare report on their cases I wonder why.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 19, 2018 19:35:29 GMT
People from a certain community have 100% anonymity when they are accused of heinous crimes involving under age girls and the BBC wouldn't dare report on their cases I wonder why. TV stars you mean? Yeah, I think you are right. |
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jul 19, 2018 19:49:16 GMT
We live in a society obsessed by celebrities so the BBC were happy to camp outside his house and fly helicopters overhead morning noon and night.
Abdul the taxi driver and Iqbal the man who sold halal chicken and other ritually slaughtered meats in the local kebab shop were left well alone by the BBC as reporting on Muslims who target under age white girls is not good for diversity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 19, 2018 20:23:52 GMT
Dam hell, not Abdul?
He only ran me down the bingo yesterday too.
Thank God (or Allah) you told me. I won't be telling him to keep the change next Wednesday.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 19, 2018 20:25:52 GMT
I do like a kebeb though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jul 19, 2018 21:29:37 GMT
We live in a society obsessed by celebrities so the BBC were happy to camp outside his house and fly helicopters overhead morning noon and night. Abdul the taxi driver and Iqbal the man who sold halal chicken and other ritually slaughtered meats in the local kebab shop were left well alone by the BBC as reporting on Muslims who target under age white girls is not good for diversity. mate did your wife run off with a middle eastern bloke or something? So much hate |
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jul 19, 2018 22:46:35 GMT
No hate just pointing out facts about the religion of peace who spread misery and fear in every country they get numbers.Been doing it for 1400 years nothing has changed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 20, 2018 4:51:16 GMT
I admire your crusade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 20, 2018 6:01:36 GMT
Apologies to the OP.
I'm not sure how a thread about press intrusion and the right/need for investigative reporting got turned into an anti Muslim rant.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jul 20, 2018 8:59:51 GMT
Difference between the way the press hounded Cliff Richard daily yet left the racist grooming gangs well alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 20, 2018 9:09:50 GMT
Difference between the way the press hounded Cliff Richard daily yet left the racist grooming gangs well alone. Were the grooming gangs racist or of a race? |
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jul 20, 2018 12:44:51 GMT
They were racist as the attacks were racially motivated when you take into account the victims.The perps were not of a particular race but they all follow a warped religious ideology.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2018 13:59:21 GMT
They were racist as the attacks were racially motivated when you take into account the victims.The perps were not of a particular race but they all follow a warped religious ideology. You do realise you falling into the trap that brands you as a bigot, don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 20, 2018 14:08:45 GMT
They were racist as the attacks were racially motivated when you take into account the victims.The perps were not of a particular race but they all follow a warped religious ideology. You do realise you falling into the trap that brands you as a bigot, don't you? Bigot, racist, we know. |
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461 
|
Post by pirate on Jul 20, 2018 14:38:46 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2018 14:48:06 GMT
I wonder what reaction there would be if the roles were reversed and Muslims were being tricked and filmed? Would probably be a hate crime and questions asked in the house! |
|
