|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 9, 2020 9:44:34 GMT
Maybe you might want to mention all the innocent people hanged, or the children born out of wedlock, taken from the mother and despatched to Australia. Right up to 1970. This "stain" is getting very large What am I supposed to actually do about it? Wear a hair shirt? If we turned this thread into a litany of bad sh** the U.K. has done to it’s own people and other countries we would be here all day- I think everyone on this thread appreciates that. The characterisation of Churchill as a flawed individual can (rather triplet I admit) he applied to Britain, as it could any other country in the world pretty much. We as humans are pre-disposed to subjugation when we have the power to realise it. Look at the capos in camps like Auschwitz, subjugated themselves but when given the opportunity eager to become “Uncle Toms” and subjugate their own. African dictators etc. Maybe we should turn it around and discuss instead how we in the U.K. have learnt from the errors of our ways? Does this country we live in today reflect the post war years? I’m listening to a history of the U.K. from 70-74 and it sounds like a different planet let alone a different country. Of course it’s not perfect, far from it. But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms. It is important to have a grasp of history, but I don’t think we need reminding of every detail of it like it’s a point scoring exercise. We know that a lot of bad sh** has happened. Do we see it in society today? 70 -74 was a different planet,the amount of change in have seen in this Country for the good in my lifetime has been considerable,as always still more to do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 9:48:17 GMT
365 "But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms."
Seriously? How many families are forced to use food banks? How many kids are living in pretty dire housing conditions?
Did I mention 2003 and the right of another nation to determine its own course? No?
Blinkers off my friend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 9:50:18 GMT
Right. I guess we can never know that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 9:55:24 GMT
365 "But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms." Seriously? How many families are forced to use food banks? How many kids are living in pretty dire housing conditions? Did I mention 2003 and the right of another nation to determine its own course? No? Blinkers off my friend. I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Jun 9, 2020 9:57:22 GMT
What am I supposed to actually do about it? Wear a hair shirt? If we turned this thread into a litany of bad sh** the U.K. has done to it’s own people and other countries we would be here all day- I think everyone on this thread appreciates that. The characterisation of Churchill as a flawed individual can (rather triplet I admit) he applied to Britain, as it could any other country in the world pretty much. We as humans are pre-disposed to subjugation when we have the power to realise it. Look at the capos in camps like Auschwitz, subjugated themselves but when given the opportunity eager to become “Uncle Toms” and subjugate their own. African dictators etc. Maybe we should turn it around and discuss instead how we in the U.K. have learnt from the errors of our ways? Does this country we live in today reflect the post war years? I’m listening to a history of the U.K. from 70-74 and it sounds like a different planet let alone a different country. Of course it’s not perfect, far from it. But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms. It is important to have a grasp of history, but I don’t think we need reminding of every detail of it like it’s a point scoring exercise. We know that a lot of bad sh** has happened. Do we see it in society today? 70 -74 was a different planet,the amount of change in have seen in this Country for the good in my lifetime has been considerable,as always still more to do. I was born in '74, not trying to take credit, just saying.😀 Possibly the 20-30 year olds who saw active service in the war coming to an age where they could influence things as people in their mid 50s, following on from the changes in the 1960s.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 9, 2020 9:58:26 GMT
365 "But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms." Seriously? How many families are forced to use food banks? How many kids are living in pretty dire housing conditions? Did I mention 2003 and the right of another nation to determine its own course? No? Blinkers off my friend. I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation. We’re tolerant and life is improving, but it still has a long long way to go yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 10:12:34 GMT
I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation. We’re tolerant and life is improving, but it still has a long long way to go yet. I wouldn’t argue that- but I was debating Oldie’s point about how in years gone by we committed atrocities like sending our orphans to Australia and criminalising homosexuality.
|
|
|
Post by gas2 on Jun 9, 2020 10:16:38 GMT
Are anybody going to London at the weekend to protect the monuments ?
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Jun 9, 2020 10:18:14 GMT
I'm finding this thread hard to read.
As an exiled but proud son of Bristolians - My Dad's family were firmly based in Bedminster for generations, and my Mum's from nearer Southville - I firmly believe that this country is as tolerant of all cultures as any in the World, and has a level of freedom of expression that is again as good as anywhere else - a freedom that was fought for by my Father and others of his generation, with the inspiration of Churchill behind them. If it had not been for that inspiration then we could easily have lost that struggle. Who knows what would have happened then - Spain would probably have joined the Axis powers, Germany would have taken the French Navy, and probably some of ours too, they most likely would have achieved the Atomic Bomb first, etc etc. I therefore would not be alive, our minority peoples would have been exterminated as would have all those in Europe. Yes Churchill, as a man of his time made mistakes and held views certainly in his early life that we are not comfortable with today, but you can't really judge through 21st century eyes. We can, and should, reflect and record achievements and the things we are not comfortable with, but put them into context of the time and the societal views and norms of those times.
This is also the case for Colston. He was a big part of a trade that we know was abhorrent. At the time Liverpool, London and of course Bristol grew rich on the trade that was supported by all pillars of society. That doesn't make it right, but it should also be noted that the British were the first to see the trade for what it was and put a stop to it, and to try to stop it throughout the rest of the world. The good things that Colston did in Bristol (and others of his ilk elsewhere) left a legacy of care and education for the poor, of education, arts and religion for all of society too. Again, we should be able to reflect both sides of the man in a reasonable, historically contexed, and reasoned way.
If we can't, then where do we stop - do we tear down all that the man did - churches, schools, etc., and do we then go further back into history and start to tear down anything with a Roman, or Saxon, or Viking, or Norman connection because of the atrocities that those cultures and people dished out to the indigenous peoples of this island and elsewhere? Do we tear down anything to do with Piracy because of the atrocities that those people carried out? Of course not - we learn, we understand, we make sure we improve and don't make the same mistakes again.
Mobs tearing things down and defacing things is not the way.
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Jun 9, 2020 11:08:09 GMT
That for sure is a stain on this country. That may yet be nothing compared to what happens in the future when the revisionists dig up some old tweets of his.... Maybe you might want to mention all the innocent people hanged, or the children born out of wedlock, taken from the mother and despatched to Australia. Right up to 1970. This "stain" is getting very large Oldie I'm gonna send you on a Mindfulness course, not that it works for me 😕
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 9, 2020 11:54:13 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 12:18:26 GMT
365 "But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms." Seriously? How many families are forced to use food banks? How many kids are living in pretty dire housing conditions? Did I mention 2003 and the right of another nation to determine its own course? No? Blinkers off my friend. I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation. And there lies the rub. Being in a queue at a food bank, or on the housing list, does it matter what your ethnicity is? Not if you are a white middle class male unaffected by such issues. But, if you are a white ethnic Brit, and you perceive ethnic minorities are getting better service than you....You can kiss tolerance goodbye. The Leave vote anyone? Look at the geographic split...now tell me we are a more tolerant society. All fine and dandy in London... Either way you play it 365 these issues are unresolved, hence why BAME groups do not see the contradiction in protesting during a pandemic. I agree with them. Floyd is a catalyst and it's happened.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 12:47:00 GMT
I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation. And there lies the rub. Being in a queue at a food bank, or on the housing list, does it matter what your ethnicity is? Not if you are a white middle class male unaffected by such issues. But, if you are a white ethnic Brit, and you perceive ethnic minorities are getting better service than you....You can kiss tolerance goodbye. The Leave vote anyone? Look at the geographic split...now tell me we are a more tolerant society. All fine and dandy in London... Either way you play it 365 these issues are unresolved, hence why BAME groups do not see the contradiction in protesting during a pandemic. I agree with them. Floyd is a catalyst and it's happened. If you don’t think we are a more tolerant society now than the seventies then nothing I say is going to convince you quite frankly. Now, I’m just off to turn on the TV and watch people not get called “w**s”, maybe I’ll have the news read to me by a black person. Whatever next!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 12:56:42 GMT
Right let’s flip it around Oldie, we know by now what you don’t like about Britain. Quite a lot, it seems.
What DO you like about the U.K.? Say something positive about it, because I have no idea what you are likely to come up with...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 13:20:34 GMT
Right let’s flip it around Oldie, we know by now what you don’t like about Britain. Quite a lot, it seems. What DO you like about the U.K.? Say something positive about it, because I have no idea what you are likely to come up with... The ability to change things, if and when things are wrong. You cannot in China or Russia. Of course, to change things, the ability to determine what is wrong is a pre requisite.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 13:29:53 GMT
Right let’s flip it around Oldie, we know by now what you don’t like about Britain. Quite a lot, it seems. What DO you like about the U.K.? Say something positive about it, because I have no idea what you are likely to come up with... The ability to change things, if and when things are wrong. You cannot in China or Russia. Of course, to change things, the ability to determine what is wrong is a pre requisite. If that’s all the U.K. has got going for it then that’s a pretty bleak outlook, seeing that democracy is a pillar of the western world
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jun 9, 2020 14:04:49 GMT
Maybe you might want to mention all the innocent people hanged, or the children born out of wedlock, taken from the mother and despatched to Australia. Right up to 1970. This "stain" is getting very large What am I supposed to actually do about it? Wear a hair shirt? If we turned this thread into a litany of bad sh** the U.K. has done to it’s own people and other countries we would be here all day- I think everyone on this thread appreciates that. The characterisation of Churchill as a flawed individual can (rather triplet I admit) he applied to Britain, as it could any other country in the world pretty much. We as humans are pre-disposed to subjugation when we have the power to realise it. Look at the capos in camps like Auschwitz, subjugated themselves but when given the opportunity eager to become “Uncle Toms” and subjugate their own. African dictators etc. Maybe we should turn it around and discuss instead how we in the U.K. have learnt from the errors of our ways? Does this country we live in today reflect the post war years? I’m listening to a history of the U.K. from 70-74 and it sounds like a different planet let alone a different country. Of course it’s not perfect, far from it. But we have improved immeasurably in our general tolerance of minorities and sexuality, better parenting, valuing children etc. We are a far more enlightened society in terms of our belief in other’s rights and freedoms. It is important to have a grasp of history, but I don’t think we need reminding of every detail of it like it’s a point scoring exercise. We know that a lot of bad sh** has happened. Do we see it in society today? Agree. **it happens. Oldie is correct in many things but there is a limit to how you can deal with historical stuff. Where it is possible to take individual cases to a legal court with witnesses and stuff then the law should take action but we can’t prosecute many historical cases, the evidence may not be strong enough. We have to hope history and historians call out the abuses and make some kind of reparation in the public domain. I think the case of Alan Turing is probably such a case, as are the examples of the Catholic Church/ unmarried mothers abuse in Ireland and the cases of British children sent to Australia and the abuse they suffered. They are all dreadful cases amongst many other dreadful cases. It’s not right but you have to hope a better, more caring world comes out of it. And that people and Governments are held to account for what they do / have done. UTG!
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Jun 9, 2020 14:05:01 GMT
I'm finding this thread hard to read. As an exiled but proud son of Bristolians - My Dad's family were firmly based in Bedminster for generations, and my Mum's from nearer Southville - I firmly believe that this country is as tolerant of all cultures as any in the World, and has a level of freedom of expression that is again as good as anywhere else - a freedom that was fought for by my Father and others of his generation, with the inspiration of Churchill behind them. If it had not been for that inspiration then we could easily have lost that struggle. Who knows what would have happened then - Spain would probably have joined the Axis powers, Germany would have taken the French Navy, and probably some of ours too, they most likely would have achieved the Atomic Bomb first, etc etc. I therefore would not be alive, our minority peoples would have been exterminated as would have all those in Europe. Yes Churchill, as a man of his time made mistakes and held views certainly in his early life that we are not comfortable with today, but you can't really judge through 21st century eyes. We can, and should, reflect and record achievements and the things we are not comfortable with, but put them into context of the time and the societal views and norms of those times. This is also the case for Colston. He was a big part of a trade that we know was abhorrent. At the time Liverpool, London and of course Bristol grew rich on the trade that was supported by all pillars of society. That doesn't make it right, but it should also be noted that the British were the first to see the trade for what it was and put a stop to it, and to try to stop it throughout the rest of the world. The good things that Colston did in Bristol (and others of his ilk elsewhere) left a legacy of care and education for the poor, of education, arts and religion for all of society too. Again, we should be able to reflect both sides of the man in a reasonable, historically contexed, and reasoned way. If we can't, then where do we stop - do we tear down all that the man did - churches, schools, etc., and do we then go further back into history and start to tear down anything with a Roman, or Saxon, or Viking, or Norman connection because of the atrocities that those cultures and people dished out to the indigenous peoples of this island and elsewhere? Do we tear down anything to do with Piracy because of the atrocities that those people carried out? Of course not - we learn, we understand, we make sure we improve and don't make the same mistakes again. Mobs tearing things down and defacing things is not the way. Well said. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jun 9, 2020 14:46:09 GMT
I purposely left class out of it particularly as this thread is about racism and my point was about tolerance of skin colour and sexuality- we all know class is a problem but that is a problem that is the problem for the state to solve not the individual. So in terms of our day to day dealings with people, outside the apparatus of the state, we are very tolerant. After the New cross fire 20,000 black people protested, at the weekend some 137,000 protested and I am sure more would have done if they weren’t respecting the pandemic situation. And there lies the rub. Being in a queue at a food bank, or on the housing list, does it matter what your ethnicity is? Not if you are a white middle class male unaffected by such issues. But, if you are a white ethnic Brit, and you perceive ethnic minorities are getting better service than you....You can kiss tolerance goodbye. The Leave vote anyone? Look at the geographic split...now tell me we are a more tolerant society. All fine and dandy in London... Either way you play it 365 these issues are unresolved, hence why BAME groups do not see the contradiction in protesting during a pandemic. I agree with them. Floyd is a catalyst and it's happened. Yes, the are many unresolved issues and that is why I said earlier on how governments need to be aware of and considering how to deal with them. One of the issues is the gap between the richest and poorest in our society. The levels of poverty that are found right next door to huge wealth is totally unacceptable. We’ve had more or less full employment over the past 10 years yet food banks and poverty are still high. Boris J talks about jobs and employment being the answer but in all honesty it appears that having a job does not narrow the inequality gap looking at the experience of the last 10 years. Racism is hugely important but so is poverty and I think dealing with inequalities and poverty is as important. Whilst I’m sure the government will do their best to resolve the race issue so I’m pretty sure they aren’t over concerned with the poverty stuff. Indeed I listen to most of them talk and feel pretty sure that, remarkably, they do not see inequality as an issue. My original point was and remains Governments need to deal with these inequalities or else we have events / incidents where the extreme groups turn legal protests into violent, thuggish behaviour which ultimately does no one any good. The people with the power to change stuff, usually governments but not always, need to be changing things that need changing and I’m not sure BJ has the grasp of detail or ideas to be able to do that. When things are going well all is fine, when it’s not I’m sure he doesn’t have the skills or the personality to bring diverse groups together. I suspect his “in tray” is going to be pretty full for the next 4 years! UTG!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2020 15:49:31 GMT
I'm finding this thread hard to read. As an exiled but proud son of Bristolians - My Dad's family were firmly based in Bedminster for generations, and my Mum's from nearer Southville - I firmly believe that this country is as tolerant of all cultures as any in the World, and has a level of freedom of expression that is again as good as anywhere else - a freedom that was fought for by my Father and others of his generation, with the inspiration of Churchill behind them. If it had not been for that inspiration then we could easily have lost that struggle. Who knows what would have happened then - Spain would probably have joined the Axis powers, Germany would have taken the French Navy, and probably some of ours too, they most likely would have achieved the Atomic Bomb first, etc etc. I therefore would not be alive, our minority peoples would have been exterminated as would have all those in Europe. Yes Churchill, as a man of his time made mistakes and held views certainly in his early life that we are not comfortable with today, but you can't really judge through 21st century eyes. We can, and should, reflect and record achievements and the things we are not comfortable with, but put them into context of the time and the societal views and norms of those times. This is also the case for Colston. He was a big part of a trade that we know was abhorrent. At the time Liverpool, London and of course Bristol grew rich on the trade that was supported by all pillars of society. That doesn't make it right, but it should also be noted that the British were the first to see the trade for what it was and put a stop to it, and to try to stop it throughout the rest of the world. The good things that Colston did in Bristol (and others of his ilk elsewhere) left a legacy of care and education for the poor, of education, arts and religion for all of society too. Again, we should be able to reflect both sides of the man in a reasonable, historically contexed, and reasoned way. If we can't, then where do we stop - do we tear down all that the man did - churches, schools, etc., and do we then go further back into history and start to tear down anything with a Roman, or Saxon, or Viking, or Norman connection because of the atrocities that those cultures and people dished out to the indigenous peoples of this island and elsewhere? Do we tear down anything to do with Piracy because of the atrocities that those people carried out? Of course not - we learn, we understand, we make sure we improve and don't make the same mistakes again. Mobs tearing things down and defacing things is not the way. Rod I don't thinkanyone is advocating tearing down anything when in critique of our history. What is being advocated is to recognise the reality of our history and put that history in context, specifically the context of those who suffered. Rod, you mention freedom of expression. How was that right of expression won, in your opinion? Was it because our ancestors sat idly by and did not object? Hardly. Would you describe as "Mobs" people such as, The Tolpuddle Martyrs, The Attendees at Peterloo, were the Chartists just a mob? Were ladies who argued and demonstrated for their right to vote, just a mob? The authorities, whoever they may be, always use this label when their authority is challenged. The sad thing is that people fall for it. Back in the 1800s, maybe up to 1939, it could the opiate of religion kept the masses at bay, but that's no excuse these days.
|
|