|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 10, 2020 7:49:31 GMT
We've drifted a little now but on D Day the British and Canadians landed over 75000 troops, the Americans 57500. We also had nearly 8000 British paratroopers dropped from the air and the Americans 15500. To say the vast majority were not British is to insult their memory. There were also ~196000 Naval personnel (my Father being one) and I don't have the figures but would expect the majority to be British. In 1940 this country, along with the Commonwealth, stood alone with what at the time must have seemed to be little hope. Had we capitulated then I am convinced History would be very different. When the Germans went East after cancelling their pact with Russia, the Artic convoys supplied vital goods to the ports of Murmansk and Archangel. These convoys also prevented the Germans forcing a another front to attack Russia via the North of Norway. My Father served on the convoys his ship being sunk whilst protecting one of those convoys. That ship - HMS Hardy - can be seen as my avatar. Given it assumes these are just estimates my numbers differ. I have Americans at 73k (23k at Utah Beach, 34k Omaha Beach, 15k airborne) with Britain at 61k and Canada at 21k. I didn't account for the navy personnel though, 52k American, 112k British, other 4k from various Allied countries. But we did almost capitulate, that's the thing. People love to point out Neville Chamberlain being a coward almost and resigning in place of Churchill who had the bollocks to defend. But Chamberlain was CRUCIAL in the war's continuation during the war cabinet crisis, and had Chamberlain not existed it's possible Churchill may have been forced to resign and a peace treaty be brokered, because Churchill wasn't the leader of the party. And if that had occurred it's possible that the Nazis would have been victorious. The most critical member of the cabinet was Attlee as it was a coalition government it needed a strong leader of the opposition and Attlee delivered that,despite their political differences He and Churchill became good friends. Chamberlains influence was marginal particularly as he was not a well man,indeed he died in November 1940.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 9:46:45 GMT
Under normal circumstances they bloody well should do! Crowds are crowds- they aren’t allowed. Well, they *weren’t* allowed The moral argument has been well and truly lost by now. After the weekend gatherings are limited to no more than 20,000 it seems 🤷♂️ But the Coventry fans are chicken feed- the real issue is when Liverpool win the league and Leeds win the championship. Imagine that? Try telling their fans to go home and save lives after the police stood by and watched 137k break the rules. I couldn’t blame those fans for feeling aggrieved and kicking off if the Police start getting involved and issuing fines either. Lockdown is over, let’s face it- let people just do what they want now. We can only wait and see what the fallout is and if it’s severe, hold an inquest in the court of public opinion. Yeah I'm really curious what'll happen when Liverpool & Leeds win their respective leagues. I expect people out in at least the same numbers as the protests. Let's hope the country will be equally as scathing on Coventry fans, Liverpool etc about the 2nd wave. I get the feeling they wont - although maybe they will, any chance to blame Liverpool They will deserve blame, but the precedent has already been set- they would just be copying what they saw on TV. Let’s be fair, if you were a Liverpool fan and you were itching to go to Anfield after winning the league for the first time in 30 years wouldn’t you be looking at the protests and thinking “okay winning the league does not compare to racism but if we have already had a total crowd of 137k for the protests, what more harm can we do by clowning about in the stadium car park?”. Every one will point to what went before and say “they started it!”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 10:28:02 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 10:52:13 GMT
As a fully fledged Baby Boomer I can understand the viewpoint of that Civil Rights activist, one who was active in the 60s. The pacifist approach was not accepted uniformly however, Martin Luther King was the acceptable face of Afro American activism, then they shot him. Malcolm X preached a more confrontational approach and they shot him. The Black Panthers sought violent confrontation and they were shot or jailed. Strangely enough one of the intellectual leads of the Black Panther movement (who was imprisoned on made up charges and subsequently cleared) Angela Davis, was interviewed very recently. It was good to hear from her again, now a Professor in California. But the point being the pacifist movement failed. Moving from Apartheid to outrageous discriminatory practice is very threadbare progress. My view is that the BLM movement, given what has (not) happened since 1968, are acting quite conservatively.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 11:15:59 GMT
As a fully fledged Baby Boomer I can understand the viewpoint of that Civil Rights activist, one who was active in the 60s. The pacifist approach was not accepted uniformly however, Martin Luther King was the acceptable face of Afro American activism, then they shot him. Malcolm X preached a more confrontational approach and they shot him. The Black Panthers sought violent confrontation and they were shot or jailed. Strangely enough one of the intellectual leads of the Black Panther movement (who was imprisoned on made up charges and subsequently cleared) Angela Davis, was interviewed very recently. It was good to hear from her again, now a Professor in California. But the point being the pacifist movement failed. Moving from Apartheid to outrageous discriminatory practice is very threadbare progress. My view is that the BLM movement, given what has (not) happened since 1968, are acting quite conservatively. I can certainly appreciate that there must be a sense of frustration by younger BAME people that not enough has been achieved by peaceful protest. Although in this country riots have hardly yielded stellar results because once the damage has been cleared up everyone goes home and forgets. We have a history of race riots in the U.K., particularly in the 80s and yet the country is as institutionally racist as ever according to some. So it goes to show that you can’t riot for 20 years to keep yourself in the public conscience, sooner or later you have to put your weapons down and work your representatives into local authority and spell out clearly what your movement stands for. It’s inevitable that genuine change will only come through getting your message out there postitively then relying on politics and the ballot box. As such I think she makes a great case for why calmer and more experienced heads are needed in the BLM movement. For once a woman of colour points out the elephant in the room about how BLMs name is misleading and works against it. It’s almost a juxtaposition to see the phrase black lives matter in the same sentence as black men 18 - 34 are more likely to die at the hands of another black man than the police. This needs to be addressed and BLM needs to change its name to something more fitting. But on the whole it’s probably counter productive having such a movement operated by younger heads because they are more prone to succumbing to the raw emotion and in such a sensitive area could lead to as much alienation to their cause as support for it. Although it’s worth te-iterating that according to people who were there the young BAME kids mostly behaved themselves and it was the typical protest day tripper who turned up at the end with the express intention of kicking off. I personally don’t think “10 minutes of handbags” at the end was bad enough to tarnish the protest as a whole but there have been a lot of people who have focused on the violence as a reason to criticise and feel alienated by the cause, which is a shame.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 11:29:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jun 10, 2020 11:42:03 GMT
Yes. That was the point of my posts earlier about inequalities and poverty. Racism is very important but so is the inequalities and poverty that seem to have been forgotten. I hope there will be no riots and I’m sure there won’t be over this but I hope the government will do something positive about it. But I doubt it. UTG!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 11:49:54 GMT
Yes. That was the point of my posts earlier about inequalities and poverty. Racism is very important but so is the inequalities and poverty that seem to have been forgotten. I hope there will be no riots and I’m sure there won’t be over this but I hope the government will do something positive about it. But I doubt it. UTG! People don’t give a sh** wareham. Social mobility and class strongly ties in to the race issue- I’m reading a pretty enlightening book at the moment by a black rapper who does a great job of tying the two issues together. The problem is, we know it’s there, we know it’s awful and we know it’s a killer, but as a society we prioritise too many other issues (brexit, the environment, racism, feminism) and are so divided on those issues that we don’t have any energy left to unite and focus on the core issue that would have an impact on the previous ones. This story will sink without trace, food banks will be with us forever more and the Tories laugh all the way to the bank that the U.K. is so divided on so many issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 11:57:26 GMT
365 "So it goes to show that you can’t riot for 20 years to keep yourself in the public conscience, sooner or later you have to put your weapons down and work your representatives into local authority and spell out clearly what your movement stands for."
I have to be honest 365 I laughed out loud at that one. There was a time, pre Thatcher, when local authorities did appear to represent their local constituency. They could raise money, borrow money to spend as they saw fit in their geographic area. Her local authority reforms completely emasculated them. Your suggestion is seeds onto stoney ground, that opportunity does not exist. For any of us. Now factor in racial prejudice on top of that. Frustrated? I would be (am)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 11:59:36 GMT
Yes. That was the point of my posts earlier about inequalities and poverty. Racism is very important but so is the inequalities and poverty that seem to have been forgotten. I hope there will be no riots and I’m sure there won’t be over this but I hope the government will do something positive about it. But I doubt it. UTG! People don’t give a sh** wareham. Social mobility and class strongly ties in to the race issue- I’m reading a pretty enlightening book at the moment by a black rapper who does a great job of tying the two issues together. The problem is, we know it’s there, we know it’s awful and we know it’s a killer, but as a society we prioritise too many other issues (brexit, the environment, racism, feminism) and are so divided on those issues that we don’t have any energy left to unite and focus on the core issue that would have an impact on the previous ones. This story will sink without trace, food banks will be with us forever more and the Tories laugh all the way to the bank that the U.K. is so divided on so many issues. Speak for yourself. Some of us have been arguing the issues around income distribution and social mobility for years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:05:18 GMT
365 "So it goes to show that you can’t riot for 20 years to keep yourself in the public conscience, sooner or later you have to put your weapons down and work your representatives into local authority and spell out clearly what your movement stands for." I have to be honest 365 I laughed out loud at that one. There was a time, pre Thatcher, when local authorities did appear to represent their local constituency. They could raise money, borrow money to spend as they saw fit in their geographic area. Her local authority reforms completely emasculated them. Your suggestion is seeds onto stoney ground, that opportunity does not exist. For any of us. Now factor in racial prejudice on top of that. Frustrated? I would be (am) You can join political parties and campaign to be elected either on the local council or for parliament though can’t you, either under the banner of Lib Dem’s or Labour or as independent/BLM political party
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:07:22 GMT
People don’t give a sh** wareham. Social mobility and class strongly ties in to the race issue- I’m reading a pretty enlightening book at the moment by a black rapper who does a great job of tying the two issues together. The problem is, we know it’s there, we know it’s awful and we know it’s a killer, but as a society we prioritise too many other issues (brexit, the environment, racism, feminism) and are so divided on those issues that we don’t have any energy left to unite and focus on the core issue that would have an impact on the previous ones. This story will sink without trace, food banks will be with us forever more and the Tories laugh all the way to the bank that the U.K. is so divided on so many issues. Speak for yourself. Some of us have been arguing the issues around income distribution and social mobility for years. Are you willing to riot over it? I imagine that article is relevant to a lot of the people who joined the protests at the weekend, I wonder how many will even read it and consider how it ties in to issues low income BAME families face?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:13:35 GMT
365 "So it goes to show that you can’t riot for 20 years to keep yourself in the public conscience, sooner or later you have to put your weapons down and work your representatives into local authority and spell out clearly what your movement stands for." I have to be honest 365 I laughed out loud at that one. There was a time, pre Thatcher, when local authorities did appear to represent their local constituency. They could raise money, borrow money to spend as they saw fit in their geographic area. Her local authority reforms completely emasculated them. Your suggestion is seeds onto stoney ground, that opportunity does not exist. For any of us. Now factor in racial prejudice on top of that. Frustrated? I would be (am) You can join political parties and campaign to be elected either on the local council or for parliament though can’t you, either under the banner of Lib Dem’s or Labour or as independent/BLM political party But you will not be empowered to do anything around the issues under discussion here. I honesty believe that the current construct of local government is an Oxymoron.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:14:39 GMT
Speak for yourself. Some of us have been arguing the issues around income distribution and social mobility for years. Are you willing to riot over it? I imagine that article is relevant to a lot of the people who joined the protests at the weekend, I wonder how many will even read it and consider how it ties in to issues low income BAME families face? Riot? Demonstrate, absolutely. Late edit You clearly have a very low opinion of people who are demonstrating over BAME issues if you think they are not acutely aware of income and mobility issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:17:51 GMT
You can join political parties and campaign to be elected either on the local council or for parliament though can’t you, either under the banner of Lib Dem’s or Labour or as independent/BLM political party But you will not be empowered to do anything around the issues under discussion here. I honesty believe that the current construct of local government is an Oxymoron. Well if you are running for Parliament you would presumably at least be elected on a ticket of a manifesto for improvements to your local area so that would show the wider country that there is an appetite by your constituents to see black issues represented at a national level. If you don’t believe that institutional change is possible then what’s the answer? Keep throwing rocks at police horses? For what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:21:37 GMT
Are you willing to riot over it? I imagine that article is relevant to a lot of the people who joined the protests at the weekend, I wonder how many will even read it and consider how it ties in to issues low income BAME families face? Riot? Demonstrate, absolutely. Late edit You clearly have a very low opinion of people who are demonstrating over BAME issues if you think they are not acutely aware of income and mobility issues. Maybe they are, but BLM do not specifically seem to talk of class issues. I haven’t heard anyone vox-popped say they want to see an end to food banks and better education. It’s almost exclusively “police brutality” and “institutionalised racism” they don’t even talk about killings in the black community (which is far more likely a cause of death than Police brutality) so forgive me if I believe that whilst they might have an awareness of it class struggle is not specifically a concern of BLM protesters it’s purely about black people vs “the system”.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:28:40 GMT
But you will not be empowered to do anything around the issues under discussion here. I honesty believe that the current construct of local government is an Oxymoron. Well if you are running for Parliament you would presumably at least be elected on a ticket of a manifesto for improvements to your local area so that would show the wider country that there is an appetite by your constituents to see black issues represented at a national level. If you don’t believe that institutional change is possible then what’s the answer? Keep throwing rocks at police horses? For what? 365 It's not my intention to come after you, but A) Are you a member of any political party? B) If yes, have you ever attended a candidate selection process C) Again, if yes, have you ever put yourself forward? Moving along, there are a decent spattering of ethnic minorities in Parliament (too low). Ask any ethnic minority group whether they feel represented... either locally or nationally, or whether they think their representatives are empowered. What is your experience and what do you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:33:24 GMT
Riot? Demonstrate, absolutely. Late edit You clearly have a very low opinion of people who are demonstrating over BAME issues if you think they are not acutely aware of income and mobility issues. Maybe they are, but BLM do not specifically seem to talk of class issues. I haven’t heard anyone vox-popped say they want to see an end to food banks and better education. It’s almost exclusively “police brutality” and “institutionalised racism” they don’t even talk about killings in the black community (which is far more likely a cause of death than Police brutality) so forgive me if I believe that whilst they might have an awareness of it class struggle is not specifically a concern of BLM protesters it’s purely about black people vs “the system”. As currently driven by the catalyst of the Floyd murder in the States. But outside of the confines of that prism, local minority activists talk constantly about housing, education and issues driven by poverty and low incomes. So much so, such is the noise they create, we have several reports on the issues produced by Parliament, as Starmer pointed out today at PMQs (another laughable performance by Johnson) and nothing happens, ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:43:50 GMT
Well if you are running for Parliament you would presumably at least be elected on a ticket of a manifesto for improvements to your local area so that would show the wider country that there is an appetite by your constituents to see black issues represented at a national level. If you don’t believe that institutional change is possible then what’s the answer? Keep throwing rocks at police horses? For what? 365 It's not my intention to come after you, but A) Are you a member of any political party? B) If yes, have you ever attended a candidate selection process C) Again, if yes, have you ever put yourself forward? Moving along, there are a decent spattering of ethnic minorities in Parliament (too low). Ask any ethnic minority group whether they feel represented... either locally or nationally, or whether they think their representatives are empowered. What is your experience and what do you think? I am not but I lived with someone who was very passionate about politics and active in his local Labour Party. As you say, there are ethnic minorities in parliament. The likes of David Lammy has managed to be elected representing a relatively poor constituency by London standards. The thing is I’m not saying this is an overnight process - but I don’t see how people can really believe in change if they don’t think it can be done through local politics. If the time is not right now with National feeling the way it is to make it “easier” for BLM’s representatives to campaign at a local level then when is it? They should have a lot of good will behind them. But real institutional change will obviously take decades. Who are the BLM youth voting for? Are they voting at all? There was a big song and dance about the grime 4 Corbyn movement that had some reasonable impact on Corbyn’s results in the 2017 election, but this time round they turned their backs on him (because of the anti-semitism iirc). If BLM youth can’t bring themselves to vote against the Tories then they are not helping themselves from the start. The Tories are very happy with the status quo and real change for anyone in society has to start with a non-Tory government. The Tories are probably laughing their tits off about the rioting- it’s a great political tool to motivate their hardcore support at a time when Cummings-gate was seeing a momentum swing to Labour. So keep rioting and keep doing Boris’s job for him. If we get a second wave that will be meat and drink to the government too and garner more Tory support at a time when they were on the ropes due to their handling of Covid. So if rioting doesn’t work and politics doesn’t work, what next?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2020 12:48:04 GMT
Maybe they are, but BLM do not specifically seem to talk of class issues. I haven’t heard anyone vox-popped say they want to see an end to food banks and better education. It’s almost exclusively “police brutality” and “institutionalised racism” they don’t even talk about killings in the black community (which is far more likely a cause of death than Police brutality) so forgive me if I believe that whilst they might have an awareness of it class struggle is not specifically a concern of BLM protesters it’s purely about black people vs “the system”. As currently driven by the catalyst of the Floyd murder in the States. But outside of the confines of that prism, local minority activists talk constantly about housing, education and issues driven by poverty and low incomes. So much so, such is the noise they create, we have several reports on the issues produced by Parliament, as Starmer pointed out today at PMQs (another laughable performance by Johnson) and nothing happens, ever. We’ve just had a “great awokening” Oldie! Everyone wants change as of two weeks ago, apparently. Local politics should be BLM’s lobster right now. Don’t tell me you are actually as cynical as me in thinking that this is all just a cause celebre fuelled by lockdown boredom and the lack of a good social cause to promote now that Greta has gone away for a while to work on her second album?
|
|