|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 14, 2020 11:07:35 GMT
Tbh Les and good morning, or don't pay much attention to stuff dragged up from 20 years ago,I will judge him and his government by what they do, now they have the power . A key tactic it seems: “oh noes, so and so said this like a million years ago, they obviously have no capacity to chaaaaaange!” See Churchill, whose beliefs were drastically altered by war but who will forever be judged by the quotes from earlier in his life. Meanwhile George Floyd puts a gun to a pregnant woman’s belly during a home invasion and the left are creating murals to him purely because of the circumstances in which he died. One set of behaviours being policed by modern day morality and the others not. So much hypocrisy. That being said, in Johnson’s case his remarks in recent times have hardly put him in a stellar light. One wonders how the U.K. can be so avowedly anti-racist now and yet only a few short weeks ago give a man who has used such racist language a stonking majority. There was a vox-pop done just after the close of the election on election night where the BBC spoke to a black woman who had voted for Boris! I literally couldn’t get over it. Penny for her thoughts now.... Guesswork,what someone says in a News paper may be about selling copy,what they do in government is very different. The election in my view was about ending the 3 year stalemate in Parliament and lots of folk held their nose and voted Tory plus the revolt in Labour heartlands was a result of years of neglect and a dislike ofor Corbyn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:07:44 GMT
At the heart of the English Establishment Check out this story: Boris Johnson said colonialism in Africa should never have ended and dismissed Britain's role in slavery flip.it/UZ591W from Flipboard. Tbh Les and good morning, or don't pay much attention to stuff dragged up from 20 years ago,I will judge him and his government by what they do, now they have the power . Nor would I generally, other than as a warning signal. But Johnson has form, right up to more recently. His comments on Muslim women being the most obvious one. Now he is Prime Minister. As for 365's comment on Floyd. The guy may well have been a low life, I don't know. But surely we can agree that even a low life cannot be chocked to death on the street by a police officer when, allegedly, posing no mortal threat to that officer? It is this that the BLM movement is addressing, not honouring Floyd as a model citizen. Although of course it suits the media to embellish the story with pictures of weeping relatives at the funeral. But that is NOT the story. This Churchill thing. 365 says we should give him slack over his pre WW2 record, as he may have to changed. It's another straw man argument because we cannot ever know. What we do know is that the British voting public did not think so, he was unceremoniously chucked out of office at the first opportunity after WW2. That tells you all you need to know. At some point we are going to have to accept history and current actuals and come up with some solutions over what we are actually going to do about it.
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 14, 2020 11:13:32 GMT
Tbh Les and good morning, or don't pay much attention to stuff dragged up from 20 years ago,I will judge him and his government by what they do, now they have the power . Nor would I generally, other than as a warning signal. But Johnson has form, right up to more recently. His comments on Muslim women being the most obvious one. Now he is Prime Minister. As for 365's comment on Floyd. The guy may well have been a low life, I don't know. But surely we can agree that even a low life cannot be chocked to death on the street by a police officer when, allegedly, posing no mortal threat to that officer? It is this that the BLM movement is addressing, not honouring Floyd as a model citizen. Although of course it suits the media to embellish the story with pictures of weeping relatives at the funeral. But that is NOT the story. This Churchill thing. 365 says we should give him slack over his pre WW2 record, as he may have to changed. It's another straw man argument because we cannot ever know. What we do know is that the British voting public did not think so, he was unceremoniously chucked out of office at the first opportunity after WW2. That tells you all you need to know. At some point we are going to have to accept history and current actuals and come up with some solutions over what we are actually going to do it about it. Churchills demise post war was also due to his inability to judge the mood of the people,after 6 horrendous war years no one was going to return to the old class system,Churchill failed to read that and whilst he had a vision for Europe he didn't for the UK,fortunately for us Attlee did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:28:32 GMT
Tbh Les and good morning, or don't pay much attention to stuff dragged up from 20 years ago,I will judge him and his government by what they do, now they have the power . Nor would I generally, other than as a warning signal. But Johnson has form, right up to more recently. His comments on Muslim women being the most obvious one. Now he is Prime Minister. As for 365's comment on Floyd. The guy may well have been a low life, I don't know. But surely we can agree that even a low life cannot be chocked to death on the street by a police officer when, allegedly, posing no mortal threat to that officer? It is this that the BLM movement is addressing, not honouring Floyd as a model citizen. Although of course it suits the media to embellish the story with pictures of weeping relatives at the funeral. But that is NOT the story. This Churchill thing. 365 says we should give him slack over his pre WW2 record, as he may have to changed. It's another straw man argument because we cannot ever know. What we do know is that the British voting public did not think so, he was unceremoniously chucked out of office at the first opportunity after WW2. That tells you all you need to know. At some point we are going to have to accept history and current actuals and come up with some solutions over what we are actually going to do about it. There was a biographer of Churchill who spoke following the protests about how his views changed immensely based on the horrors of war- which you would think was a natural and humane outcome for anyone. Floyd was a low life but had become a reformed character and his last conviction was in 2007- he had even posted a video on YouTube in the days leading up to his death urging black youths to do something positive with their lives (counterfeit money and traces of methamphetamine in his system at the time he died notwithstanding). But that’s the issue of trying to erase one person’s past whilst highlighting the other’s to suit your narrative and make your hero’s out of imperfect people- hypocrisy reigns supreme. No-one is able to see the wood for the trees anymore because their argument is so blinkered and polarised.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:34:27 GMT
A key tactic it seems: “oh noes, so and so said this like a million years ago, they obviously have no capacity to chaaaaaange!” See Churchill, whose beliefs were drastically altered by war but who will forever be judged by the quotes from earlier in his life. Meanwhile George Floyd puts a gun to a pregnant woman’s belly during a home invasion and the left are creating murals to him purely because of the circumstances in which he died. One set of behaviours being policed by modern day morality and the others not. So much hypocrisy. That being said, in Johnson’s case his remarks in recent times have hardly put him in a stellar light. One wonders how the U.K. can be so avowedly anti-racist now and yet only a few short weeks ago give a man who has used such racist language a stonking majority. There was a vox-pop done just after the close of the election on election night where the BBC spoke to a black woman who had voted for Boris! I literally couldn’t get over it. Penny for her thoughts now.... Guesswork,what someone says in a News paper may be about selling copy,what they do in government is very different. The election in my view was about ending the 3 year stalemate in Parliament and lots of folk held their nose and voted Tory plus the revolt in Labour heartlands was a result of years of neglect and a dislike ofor Corbyn. Yes Corbyn was a tough sell undoubtedly. My view is: do people of colour really expect institutional change to come from a Tory government? If you want change you have to vote for someone else even if it means holding your nose and voting for someone like Corbyn. BAME voting Tory instantly diminishes my sympathy. As does the grime 4 Corbyn movement turning their backs on him because of the anti-semitism. if you can risk lives in your community during a pandemic then voting for someone you don’t wholeheartedly support should be a walk in the park imo.
|
|
|
Post by matealotblue on Jun 14, 2020 11:44:31 GMT
Even Keir Hardie said things ( on the House of Commons record) that probably wouldn’t be acceptable today regarding immigration to Scotland....think we have to accept no one is perfect and if you look hard enough we all have flaws in either actions and/or words. Just kind of depends how you want to use it to shape your argument I guess. And for that reason , to me, it’s a largely pointless exercise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:51:30 GMT
365 On Churchill (which really is a side issue and one for all of us regardless of BAME issues) You wrote "There was a biographer of Churchill who spoke following the protests about how his views changed immensely based on the horrors of war"
Given he served in in the Boer War, was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1914...it's pretty hard to believe his views were tempered by WW2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:54:06 GMT
365 On Churchill (which really is a side issue and one for all of us regardless of BAME issues) You wrote "There was a biographer of Churchill who spoke following the protests about how his views changed immensely based on the horrors of war" Given he served in in the Boer War, was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1914...it's pretty hard to believe his views were tempered by WW2. So you don’t believe that our views can change with age also then? I would imagine Churchill, like every one of us, was a completely different person in 1945 than he was in 1914.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 11:57:50 GMT
Even Keir Hardie said things ( on the House of Commons record) that probably wouldn’t be acceptable today regarding immigration to Scotland....think we have to accept no one is perfect and if you look hard enough we all have flaws in either actions and/or words. Just kind of depends how you want to use it to shape your argument I guess. And for that reason , to me, it’s a largely pointless exercise. Agree We can only change the here and now. History informs, removing information and pointers to our history acts as a barrier to learning. In my opinion. So talking of our Prime Minister... Talking of the unpublished report into the BAME death rate in this Pandemic, talking of the far higher death rates amongst lower income groups (regardless of ethnicity)....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 12:04:21 GMT
365 On Churchill (which really is a side issue and one for all of us regardless of BAME issues) You wrote "There was a biographer of Churchill who spoke following the protests about how his views changed immensely based on the horrors of war" Given he served in in the Boer War, was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1914...it's pretty hard to believe his views were tempered by WW2. So you don’t believe that our views can change with age also then? I would imagine Churchill, like every one of us, was a completely different person in 1945 than he was in 1914. You can imagine all you like, it's just a claim. Speaking personally as an older person, my views have not changed fundamentally, better informed undoubtedly by experience and learning, more "tempered" most certainly. But the untruths of the 50s and 60s (My childhood and teen years) remain untrue. The sad thing is the same "untruths" are alive and kicking today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 12:04:30 GMT
Even Keir Hardie said things ( on the House of Commons record) that probably wouldn’t be acceptable today regarding immigration to Scotland....think we have to accept no one is perfect and if you look hard enough we all have flaws in either actions and/or words. Just kind of depends how you want to use it to shape your argument I guess. And for that reason , to me, it’s a largely pointless exercise. Agree We can only change the here and now. History informs, removing information and pointers to our history acts as a barrier to learning. In my opinion. So talking of our Prime Minister... Talking of the unpublished report into the BAME death rate in this Pandemic, talking of the far higher death rates amongst lower income groups (regardless of ethnicity).... That’s obviously another stain against the government, although let’s be honest we’ve all run out of fingers to count them on. They have had a very lucky lockdown with this protest stuff dividing opinion and taking the heat off them. This report, Jenrick’s fluffing of Tory donators, their disrespect and avarice is on full display. It’s a pity the public don’t have an emergency “no confidence” button we can press to trigger an election because right now I suspect most of the nation would be close to pressing it either because of Cummings-gate, PPE, racism or just sheer bloody fed up of 10 years of this bollocks.
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 14, 2020 13:13:44 GMT
Agree We can only change the here and now. History informs, removing information and pointers to our history acts as a barrier to learning. In my opinion. So talking of our Prime Minister... Talking of the unpublished report into the BAME death rate in this Pandemic, talking of the far higher death rates amongst lower income groups (regardless of ethnicity).... That’s obviously another stain against the government, although let’s be honest we’ve all run out of fingers to count them on. They have had a very lucky lockdown with this protest stuff dividing opinion and taking the heat off them. This report, Jenrick’s fluffing of Tory donators, their disrespect and avarice is on full display. It’s a pity the public don’t have an emergency “no confidence” button we can press to trigger an election because right now I suspect most of the nation would be close to pressing it either because of Cummings-gate, PPE, racism or just sheer bloody fed up of 10 years of this bollocks. THe BAME report is a red herring another piece of information that has now become fact. It's a report owned by PHE and in draft,even the dear old BBC have made that clear. It will be put in the Public domain next week at the same time it's issued to ministers by PHE. The only reason Labour MP'S like Lammy are going on and on about it is because the bloke who drafted it leaked it as well. No one to my knowledge ever puts draft reports into the Public domain until they have been through a reviewing process. I get sick and tired of this sort of stuff it's not a conspiracy it's not anyone burying anything it's a PHE report.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 13:20:52 GMT
That’s obviously another stain against the government, although let’s be honest we’ve all run out of fingers to count them on. They have had a very lucky lockdown with this protest stuff dividing opinion and taking the heat off them. This report, Jenrick’s fluffing of Tory donators, their disrespect and avarice is on full display. It’s a pity the public don’t have an emergency “no confidence” button we can press to trigger an election because right now I suspect most of the nation would be close to pressing it either because of Cummings-gate, PPE, racism or just sheer bloody fed up of 10 years of this bollocks. THe BAME report is a red herring another piece of information that has now become fact. It's a report owned by PHE and in draft,even the dear old BBC have made that clear. It will be put in the Public domain next week at the same time it's issued to ministers by PHE. The only reason Labour MP'S like Lammy are going on and on about it is because the bloke who drafted it leaked it as well. No one to my knowledge ever puts draft reports into the Public domain until they have been through a reviewing process. I get sick and tired of this sort of stuff it's not a conspiracy it's not anyone burying anything it's a PHE report. Interesting, thanks for the clarification. It seems everything is being jumped on atm and twisted in to their chosen narrative following George Floyd’s killing.
|
|
|
Post by matealotblue on Jun 14, 2020 13:48:55 GMT
THe BAME report is a red herring another piece of information that has now become fact. It's a report owned by PHE and in draft,even the dear old BBC have made that clear. It will be put in the Public domain next week at the same time it's issued to ministers by PHE. The only reason Labour MP'S like Lammy are going on and on about it is because the bloke who drafted it leaked it as well. No one to my knowledge ever puts draft reports into the Public domain until they have been through a reviewing process. I get sick and tired of this sort of stuff it's not a conspiracy it's not anyone burying anything it's a PHE report. Interesting, thanks for the clarification. It seems everything is being jumped on atm and twisted in to their chosen narrative following George Floyd’s killing. Thing is, for me, this just highlights a bigger issue and I guess in reality there ain’t much you can do about it in this day and age except cross check and reference where you can. In that the “social media”, and indeed the press ( both sides of the political divide) are spewing out all sorts of crap to push a narrative and fiction becomes fact in the blink of an eye. If you say something long enough and loud enough...it becomes the truth! You can’t handle the truth...!! (As the man said🤪) Think I even read somewhere a new stadium was being talked about for BRFC....now that just ain’t right. Surely?
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 14, 2020 14:22:36 GMT
Interesting, thanks for the clarification. It seems everything is being jumped on atm and twisted in to their chosen narrative following George Floyd’s killing. Thing is, for me, this just highlights a bigger issue and I guess in reality there ain’t much you can do about it in this day and age except cross check and reference where you can. In that the “social media”, and indeed the press ( both sides of the political divide) are spewing out all sorts of crap to push a narrative and fiction becomes fact in the blink of an eye. If you say something long enough and loud enough...it becomes the truth! You can’t handle the truth...!! (As the man said🤪) Think I even read somewhere a new stadium was being talked about for BRFC....now that just ain’t right. Surely? Absolutely all I want is the facts and evidence presented impartially, I don't want Laura/Emilys opinion or interpretation as it's not more valid than mine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 14:28:20 GMT
THe BAME report is a red herring another piece of information that has now become fact. It's a report owned by PHE and in draft,even the dear old BBC have made that clear. It will be put in the Public domain next week at the same time it's issued to ministers by PHE. The only reason Labour MP'S like Lammy are going on and on about it is because the bloke who drafted it leaked it as well. No one to my knowledge ever puts draft reports into the Public domain until they have been through a reviewing process. I get sick and tired of this sort of stuff it's not a conspiracy it's not anyone burying anything it's a PHE report. Interesting, thanks for the clarification. It seems everything is being jumped on atm and twisted in to their chosen narrative following George Floyd’s killing. It doesn’t help when people trawl back through people’s history, social media for example, to get a “gotcha” moment. All it does is stir up more hatred and division but I guess that is what some want to achieve! It reminds me of the London olympics when Stuart Pearce was the manager of the U.K. football team. He’d been appointed many months before but just as the games were about to start a tabloid brought up a racist incident that had already been made public and dealt with 20 years before.
|
|
|
Post by Big Jock on Jun 14, 2020 16:28:30 GMT
Fed up of all this hate and violence. Wankers on both side of the protests today and last week. All they are doing is causing more division. Why can't we just be civilised human beings Agree 100% pal.
But please remember we are surrounded by so many good people, so try not to concentrate on th bad few.
This for me is th picture of th year so far......
A BLM protestor carrying a counter protestor to safety.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 18:50:42 GMT
Thing is, for me, this just highlights a bigger issue and I guess in reality there ain’t much you can do about it in this day and age except cross check and reference where you can. In that the “social media”, and indeed the press ( both sides of the political divide) are spewing out all sorts of crap to push a narrative and fiction becomes fact in the blink of an eye. If you say something long enough and loud enough...it becomes the truth! You can’t handle the truth...!! (As the man said🤪) Think I even read somewhere a new stadium was being talked about for BRFC....now that just ain’t right. Surely? Absolutely all I want is the facts and evidence presented impartially, I don't want Laura/Emilys opinion or interpretation as it's not more valid than mine. This one Clive "The extra part of the evidence review summarises testimony received by PHE’s Prof Kevin Fenton, the report’s author, from about 4,000 stakeholders, including BAME groups and academics. “It is clear from discussions with stakeholders the pandemic exposed and exacerbated longstanding inequalities affecting BAME communities in the UK,” it said." And "This element of the review was "held back" by the government because of "current global tensions" such as the Black Lives Matter movement, Sky News can reveal. Whitehall sources told Sky News releasing this element would be in "too close proximity" to the protests." So.....
|
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,561
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Jun 14, 2020 19:37:56 GMT
Fed up of all this hate and violence. Wankers on both side of the protests today and last week. All they are doing is causing more division. Why can't we just be civilised human beings Agree 100% pal.
But please remember we are surrounded by so many good people, so try not to concentrate on th bad few.
This for me is th picture of th year so far......
A BLM protestor carrying a counter protestor to safety.
Well said, Jock, my thoughts too. Maybe it will have a positive reaction. ""If the three police officers that stood by and watched had done what we have done, he would still be here today. "When I saw that my heart bled and I thought we're different, we're not like that. Humanity first." " news.sky.com/story/blm-supporter-who-helped-injured-protester-if-we-hadnt-intervened-i-think-he-may-have-died-12006819
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 20:19:02 GMT
Agree 100% pal.
But please remember we are surrounded by so many good people, so try not to concentrate on th bad few.
This for me is th picture of th year so far......
A BLM protestor carrying a counter protestor to safety.
Well said, Jock, my thoughts too. Maybe it will have a positive reaction. ""If the three police officers that stood by and watched had done what we have done, he would still be here today. "When I saw that my heart bled and I thought we're different, we're not like that. Humanity first." " news.sky.com/story/blm-supporter-who-helped-injured-protester-if-we-hadnt-intervened-i-think-he-may-have-died-12006819There you go. I wonder if the "counter protester" who is being carried by the BLM supporter had been throwing Nazi salutes earlier. Sometimes a picture speaks a thousand words
|
|