|
Post by William Wilson on Sept 3, 2020 11:00:26 GMT
Is that as far into the video as you got? You didn`t stay to hear what Senator DeBerry and his father, and millions like them did to change that law? They marched, and they protested ( peacefully, and with dignity ) they shone a light on what was going on, and when enough people joined them, and when enough people could see how wrong the law that oppressed them was, the law was changed. By their actions, the law that said they had to walk in back doors, and ride on the back of the bus, was done away with. And when the protests changed to burning down city blocks, ( their own city blocks ) he and his father walked away. Because, apart from anything else, it`s not going to do anything to further the cause of race relations in the country. Au contraire, it`s just polarising opinion even more. What would I do/have done? I like think that I`d have joined Mr DeBerry and his father on those marches. Like I said it's the decades old argument amongst the Afro American Community, do you follow the MLK method of protest and resistance or the more "direct action" methods of Malcolm X. To be fair the vast majority followed MLK, for a couple of reasons. A) He was right to call out the Apartheid. B) He had the Christian Church (mainstream if not the loonies) behind him C) The liberal Jewish community supported him (a big deal in New York, politically) D) He preached passive, non violent resistance. I think all of us who were around in the UK in the mid to late 60s supported him, if you were inclined to believe that the State was oppressing minority groups, or indeed anyone who dared challenge the establishment. The sad thing is that here we are 50 years later and still the same debate is being had. Afro Americans are evidentially treated differently by the authorities. So can anyone claim that passive resistance worked? Before anyone jumps down my throat I am not arguing for violence, but I am suggesting that you can understand the anger and frustration felt by the Afro American community. Once you get that then perhaps the knee jerk reactions can be tempered. Let's not forget also that three people were shot dead as soon as there became evidence that their views were gaining traction, or sympathy, in "mainstream" America. Martin Luther King Bobby Kennedy And to a lesser extent Malcolm X who converted to Islam. AKA Malcolm Little. Trump is now applying the same tactic, describing protesters as "Domestic Terrorists" and defending the white vigilante supremacists who shoot them. Some things never change do they. As for you joining the marches William if you had been around, admirable but not enough. Would you have walked into the Blacks Only Bathroom? Used the Blacks Only Entrances? Would you have joined the Congress of Racial Equality, an act along with their own selfless activism got Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, three Jewish young men, murdered in Mississippi in 1964? I can`t say with any certainty what I would have done, if I`d lived in that time and under those circumstances. Can you? Can anyone? I`m pretty sure I know what I wouldn`t have done though. I wouldn`t have got a can of petrol, and started setting fire to my own neighbourhood. According to an article in the ST, one of the buildings burned down in Kenosha was owned by a local black businesswoman, and sold hair products for the local black community. HTF does setting that on fire help anybody? The anger and frustration felt by the African American community may well be understandable, but giving vent to it to the extent that they burn down their own communities, isn`t.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2020 11:10:42 GMT
Like I said it's the decades old argument amongst the Afro American Community, do you follow the MLK method of protest and resistance or the more "direct action" methods of Malcolm X. To be fair the vast majority followed MLK, for a couple of reasons. A) He was right to call out the Apartheid. B) He had the Christian Church (mainstream if not the loonies) behind him C) The liberal Jewish community supported him (a big deal in New York, politically) D) He preached passive, non violent resistance. I think all of us who were around in the UK in the mid to late 60s supported him, if you were inclined to believe that the State was oppressing minority groups, or indeed anyone who dared challenge the establishment. The sad thing is that here we are 50 years later and still the same debate is being had. Afro Americans are evidentially treated differently by the authorities. So can anyone claim that passive resistance worked? Before anyone jumps down my throat I am not arguing for violence, but I am suggesting that you can understand the anger and frustration felt by the Afro American community. Once you get that then perhaps the knee jerk reactions can be tempered. Let's not forget also that three people were shot dead as soon as there became evidence that their views were gaining traction, or sympathy, in "mainstream" America. Martin Luther King Bobby Kennedy And to a lesser extent Malcolm X who converted to Islam. AKA Malcolm Little. Trump is now applying the same tactic, describing protesters as "Domestic Terrorists" and defending the white vigilante supremacists who shoot them. Some things never change do they. As for you joining the marches William if you had been around, admirable but not enough. Would you have walked into the Blacks Only Bathroom? Used the Blacks Only Entrances? Would you have joined the Congress of Racial Equality, an act along with their own selfless activism got Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, three Jewish young men, murdered in Mississippi in 1964? Against that backdrop and the continued killings, the ridiculous disproportionate representation of minority groups in disadvantaged lower income group, is anyone really surprised that people protest? I’m sure we can all empathise with the frustration that must be felt but the problem is that the anti-social behaviour these protests spawn only hurts the communities these people live in and encourages the use of militias who shoot people and compound the problem. I read an interesting report on how these militias work by a girl from a rural Mormon community where their militia is actually an extension of the community itself - they are volunteers chosen by the a local committee comprising of the Sheriff and some other notable local officials and their job is totally different to local law enforcement. As far as I was able to understand it the militias are supposed to protect private property and ensure that no-one suspected of being a trouble maker gains access to the community in the first place, using force if necessary. It all sounds pretty ridiculous to me but these are the times Americans seem to be living in. It goes without saying that this is an actual organised militia the problem gets far worse in the bigger cities where it’s disorganised and you have people (like that 17 year old) running round with guns under the pretence of keeping the streets safe from rioters. It has shades of the private security forces in the South African townships who do the work the place can’t or won’t do. Crazy for one of the most economically advanced nations on this planet. Although it’s well to say that it’s not known whose side the violent rioters are on, this article (which explains why I would nuke Portland btw) suggests that it’s actually a battle of anti-government forces who have hi-jacked the BLM movement. I have argued all along that BLM has been co-opted by the radical left wing for their own hard left agenda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53996159I struggle to believe that any law enforcement officer in the States would actually support and encourage armed groups to roam their streets and act as a surrogate police force. I do not believe that is legal in any State. But you quote the fruit cakes in the Norman faith, enough said. Btw, would you submit to and acquiesce with Apartheid Laws if they were on the Statute Book, as did the Senator from Tennessee?
|
|
|
Post by matealotblue on Sept 3, 2020 11:25:01 GMT
I’m sure we can all empathise with the frustration that must be felt but the problem is that the anti-social behaviour these protests spawn only hurts the communities these people live in and encourages the use of militias who shoot people and compound the problem. I read an interesting report on how these militias work by a girl from a rural Mormon community where their militia is actually an extension of the community itself - they are volunteers chosen by the a local committee comprising of the Sheriff and some other notable local officials and their job is totally different to local law enforcement. As far as I was able to understand it the militias are supposed to protect private property and ensure that no-one suspected of being a trouble maker gains access to the community in the first place, using force if necessary. It all sounds pretty ridiculous to me but these are the times Americans seem to be living in. It goes without saying that this is an actual organised militia the problem gets far worse in the bigger cities where it’s disorganised and you have people (like that 17 year old) running round with guns under the pretence of keeping the streets safe from rioters. It has shades of the private security forces in the South African townships who do the work the place can’t or won’t do. Crazy for one of the most economically advanced nations on this planet. Although it’s well to say that it’s not known whose side the violent rioters are on, this article (which explains why I would nuke Portland btw) suggests that it’s actually a battle of anti-government forces who have hi-jacked the BLM movement. I have argued all along that BLM has been co-opted by the radical left wing for their own hard left agenda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53996159I struggle to believe that any law enforcement officer in the States would actually support and encourage armed groups to roam their streets and act as a surrogate police force. I do not believe that is legal in any State. But you quote the fruit cakes in the Norman faith, enough said. Btw, would you submit to and acquiesce with Apartheid Laws if they were on the Statute Book, as did the Senator from Tennessee? Within the United States, since approximately 1992, there have been a number of private organizations that call themselves militia or unorganized militia.[65] In states such as Texas, the state constitution classifies male citizens between the ages of 17 and 45 to belong to the "Unorganized Reserve Militia".[66] The Texas constitution also grants the county sheriff and the governor of the state the authority to call upon the unorganized reserve militia to uphold the peace, repel invasion, and suppress rebellion, similar to the early "Texas Rangers".
Not sure how this plays out across the rest of US...but this (from Wiki) seems to indicate there may be some legitimacy to use of these groups? Would need someone with greater knowledge than me to expand on that point though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2020 11:37:41 GMT
Like I said it's the decades old argument amongst the Afro American Community, do you follow the MLK method of protest and resistance or the more "direct action" methods of Malcolm X. To be fair the vast majority followed MLK, for a couple of reasons. A) He was right to call out the Apartheid. B) He had the Christian Church (mainstream if not the loonies) behind him C) The liberal Jewish community supported him (a big deal in New York, politically) D) He preached passive, non violent resistance. I think all of us who were around in the UK in the mid to late 60s supported him, if you were inclined to believe that the State was oppressing minority groups, or indeed anyone who dared challenge the establishment. The sad thing is that here we are 50 years later and still the same debate is being had. Afro Americans are evidentially treated differently by the authorities. So can anyone claim that passive resistance worked? Before anyone jumps down my throat I am not arguing for violence, but I am suggesting that you can understand the anger and frustration felt by the Afro American community. Once you get that then perhaps the knee jerk reactions can be tempered. Let's not forget also that three people were shot dead as soon as there became evidence that their views were gaining traction, or sympathy, in "mainstream" America. Martin Luther King Bobby Kennedy And to a lesser extent Malcolm X who converted to Islam. AKA Malcolm Little. Trump is now applying the same tactic, describing protesters as "Domestic Terrorists" and defending the white vigilante supremacists who shoot them. Some things never change do they. As for you joining the marches William if you had been around, admirable but not enough. Would you have walked into the Blacks Only Bathroom? Used the Blacks Only Entrances? Would you have joined the Congress of Racial Equality, an act along with their own selfless activism got Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, three Jewish young men, murdered in Mississippi in 1964? I can`t say with any certainty what I would have done, if I`d lived in that time and under those circumstances. Can you? Can anyone? I`m pretty sure I know what I wouldn`t have done though. I wouldn`t have got a can of petrol, and started setting fire to my own neighbourhood. According to an article in the ST, one of the buildings burned down in Kenosha was owned by a local black businesswoman, and sold hair products for the local black community. HTF does setting that on fire help anybody? The anger and frustration felt by the African American community may well be understandable, but giving vent to it to the extent that they burn down their own communities, isn`t. Ultimately William I guess one's reaction comes down to the degree to which one tolerates injustice at the lower end of the scale to fascism at the other.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 3, 2020 11:48:19 GMT
What's awful about all of this, is there's an awful lot of good cops over there who put their lives on the line against some of the worst people you couldn't wish to meet. A few rogue officers taking it too far and all hell breaks loose.
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Sept 4, 2020 5:57:02 GMT
I can`t say with any certainty what I would have done, if I`d lived in that time and under those circumstances. Can you? Can anyone? I`m pretty sure I know what I wouldn`t have done though. I wouldn`t have got a can of petrol, and started setting fire to my own neighbourhood. According to an article in the ST, one of the buildings burned down in Kenosha was owned by a local black businesswoman, and sold hair products for the local black community. HTF does setting that on fire help anybody? The anger and frustration felt by the African American community may well be understandable, but giving vent to it to the extent that they burn down their own communities, isn`t. Ultimately William I guess one's reaction comes down to the degree to which one tolerates injustice at the lower end of the scale to fascism at the other. Ok. So you`ve demonstrated your intolerance of fascism, by burning down your neighbourhood. What do you do then? Go cap in hand to the aforementioned fascist state that oppressed you, to build it up again?
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Sept 4, 2020 6:09:17 GMT
I’m sure we can all empathise with the frustration that must be felt but the problem is that the anti-social behaviour these protests spawn only hurts the communities these people live in and encourages the use of militias who shoot people and compound the problem. I read an interesting report on how these militias work by a girl from a rural Mormon community where their militia is actually an extension of the community itself - they are volunteers chosen by the a local committee comprising of the Sheriff and some other notable local officials and their job is totally different to local law enforcement. As far as I was able to understand it the militias are supposed to protect private property and ensure that no-one suspected of being a trouble maker gains access to the community in the first place, using force if necessary. It all sounds pretty ridiculous to me but these are the times Americans seem to be living in. It goes without saying that this is an actual organised militia the problem gets far worse in the bigger cities where it’s disorganised and you have people (like that 17 year old) running round with guns under the pretence of keeping the streets safe from rioters. It has shades of the private security forces in the South African townships who do the work the place can’t or won’t do. Crazy for one of the most economically advanced nations on this planet. Although it’s well to say that it’s not known whose side the violent rioters are on, this article (which explains why I would nuke Portland btw) suggests that it’s actually a battle of anti-government forces who have hi-jacked the BLM movement. I have argued all along that BLM has been co-opted by the radical left wing for their own hard left agenda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53996159I struggle to believe that any law enforcement officer in the States would actually support and encourage armed groups to roam their streets and act as a surrogate police force. I do not believe that is legal in any State. But you quote the fruit cakes in the Norman faith, enough said. Btw, would you submit to and acquiesce with Apartheid Laws if they were on the Statute Book, as did the Senator from Tennessee? What do you think you would have done, Gas 365? Would you have done the same as the Senator from Tennessee, and marched and protested peacefully with MLK and the Millionmen, and forced those apartheid laws off of the statute book? Or would you do the same as Oldie, and sit on your arse day after day, carrying on like you`re Steve Biko, and demanding to know what everyone else is going to do?
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Sept 4, 2020 7:06:43 GMT
Whilst I understand your sentiments I can say that during my adult life I have witnessed many acts of selflessness and charitable acts that have been inspiring and leaves me to think we are not beyond redemption. I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 4, 2020 7:15:45 GMT
I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. Problem is, there's a lot of stupid people out there, incapable of making a decision of their own and just follow the pack.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 7:41:01 GMT
I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. So what about the masses of people that live in poverty, are they less individual than those who live comfortably? Humans need a master, and we get it in the form of the culture (system) we are born in to. If you reject the system of capitalism, you won't survive in society, hence winners & losers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 7:42:14 GMT
I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. Problem is, there's a lot of stupid people out there, incapable of making a decision of their own and just follow the pack. I'd say anyone who thinks someone else is stupider than them, is the one who is truely an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Sept 4, 2020 7:42:26 GMT
Whilst I understand your sentiments I can say that during my adult life I have witnessed many acts of selflessness and charitable acts that have been inspiring and leaves me to think we are not beyond redemption. I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. Our minds interpret our world, yours has done so accordingly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:02:53 GMT
I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. Our minds interpret our world, yours has done so accordingly. Who's theory is that? (I'm quite in to philosophy obviously)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:36:37 GMT
Ultimately William I guess one's reaction comes down to the degree to which one tolerates injustice at the lower end of the scale to fascism at the other. Ok. So you`ve demonstrated your intolerance of fascism, by burning down your neighbourhood. What do you do then? Go cap in hand to the aforementioned fascist state that oppressed you, to build it up again? Come on William, you are being one eyed on this. The States is not (yet) a fascist country. But it is unjust. So when passive resistance does not bring about change, what do you do? Before you jump on me, I am not advocating violence, I am asking a question. What would you do?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:39:45 GMT
I struggle to believe that any law enforcement officer in the States would actually support and encourage armed groups to roam their streets and act as a surrogate police force. I do not believe that is legal in any State. But you quote the fruit cakes in the Norman faith, enough said. Btw, would you submit to and acquiesce with Apartheid Laws if they were on the Statute Book, as did the Senator from Tennessee? What do you think you would have done, Gas 365? Would you have done the same as the Senator from Tennessee, and marched and protested peacefully with MLK and the Millionmen, and forced those apartheid laws off of the statute book? Or would you do the same as Oldie, and sit on your arse day after day, carrying on like you`re Steve Biko, and demanding to know what everyone else is going to do? Would be good if he answered that, given his stated position. Notwithstanding the fact that you have some pathological preponderance to sling insults my way at every opportunity. But hey ho.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:40:38 GMT
I wonder how many truely selfless people there are out there, much less than 1% would be my guess. Modern culture is built on a capitalist system, so it's 'winners or losers'. The system is to blame for people being selfish. I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. Agreed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:42:00 GMT
I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. So what about the masses of people that live in poverty, are they less individual than those who live comfortably? Humans need a master, and we get it in the form of the culture (system) we are born in to. If you reject the system of capitalism, you won't survive in society, hence winners & losers. Far to simplistic my friend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:45:14 GMT
I don't accept the "system "is to blame,we are all individuals have our own values, integrity and ability to make informed decisions blaming the system is a cop out. Agreed. Would you agree that greed and corruption will vastly help the individual rise to the top of the current system?
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Sept 4, 2020 8:46:18 GMT
Our minds interpret our world, yours has done so accordingly. Who's theory is that? (I'm quite in to philosophy obviously) My own experience. When I've been in a depressed state and when I've come out of it I've realised the world has stayed the same only my mind has changed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2020 8:46:42 GMT
So what about the masses of people that live in poverty, are they less individual than those who live comfortably? Humans need a master, and we get it in the form of the culture (system) we are born in to. If you reject the system of capitalism, you won't survive in society, hence winners & losers. Far to simplistic my friend. Yeah it's a lot to package into a paragraph 🙂, far too complex an issue to fully go in to, but worth examining from every angle.
|
|