yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,477
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Dec 16, 2020 18:09:04 GMT
I just call it as I see it ..... I’ve read plenty of your anti Muslim crap , your victimisation of the grenfell fire , your wrongful claims that Muslims were more likely to be involved in rape gangs and your claim that the silent majority were behind the Milwall booing . You won’t find any anti semantic posting from me anywhere. I’ve called it out on here and other places. You can twist stuff to suit your agenda all you like......but the one thing you can't change and I notice you conveniently overlooked it is that you actively supported putting a proven racist party into power at the last election.......so rage all you like but when it boils down to it you and many of your leftie cohort are the biggest culprits going and you try and deflect this by attacking others!! 🥱
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Dec 16, 2020 18:18:51 GMT
No evidence the NHS wouldn't be able to cope. Isolate people with symptoms and protect the vulnerable and at risk groups. The NHS certainly won't be helped by "the biggest economic decline in 300 years." Sorry but that's just bollocks So what you saying Pirate is the NHS are coping very well with the pandemic and even have a greater capacity than needed at the moment, isn't that great planning? What benefit would the government derive from 'brainwashing people' and having 'the worst economic decline in 300 years'? The answer hopefully will enlighten us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2020 19:45:36 GMT
Pirate I guess the working example is in America. 3,000 people a day dying, State Health authorities saying their hospitals are dangerously close to capacity. Jan and Feb is their normal "peak" respiratory disease period. The economic hit has been pretty uniform whether a State went into full lockdown, or not.
There is no perfect answer to this, but I would say this to you mate. We can make a mistake and overkill on the economy. But we can build that back. If we undercall the Health response you cannot resurrect the dead.
I would rather be wrong about the economy than life.
It's sh**, but here we are. Meeting at work today and some glum faces. I told them we get through this together and we start planning for Spring now. Lots to do....but they saw that light. Going on and on over a non black and white situation absolutely does not help.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Dec 16, 2020 20:32:40 GMT
Sorry but that's just bollocks So what you saying Pirate is the NHS are coping very well with the pandemic and even have a greater capacity than needed at the moment, isn't that great planning? What benefit would the government derive from 'brainwashing people' and having 'the worst economic decline in 300 years'? The answer hopefully will enlighten us. We might be in 'the worst economic decline in 300 years', but Tory 'chumocracy' have done ok with their contracts to friends for PPE and tests etc, Hedge funders like Crispin Odey who put Boris into power have made millions, billionaires have increased their wealth by about 3 trillion in total, big pharma companies set to make billions...and to top it off the government have realised the obedient, conformist, subservient masses welcome a nanny state and can be easily governed by fear and propaganda. As Lord Sumption brilliantly put it, this is the “most significant interference with personal freedom in the history of our country...the British public has not even begun to understand the seriousness of what is happening to our country...The government has discovered the power of public fear to let it get its way. It will not forget.”
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Dec 16, 2020 20:48:48 GMT
Every person that has skin in the game (to coin an American phrase? that I have spoken to just wants a level playing field so that it's only talent and work ethic that counts. The trouble is that is not always the case. It starts in childhood, with poor education, poor housing, financial pressure on the parents. Which then becomes a vicious circle, which it has I know you didn't bring it up Oldie, but can we not do the whole race thing yet again? Plenty of threads in this section for that already Reading this thread has been funny, ironic, head-shaking at some of the moronic it-will-be-alright views, but finally it got to what is pretty near the base of the need for health care, people being treated equally and most things. Gassy, you're right to stop us going back to discussing racism so I won’t. But oldie is right to support a meritocracy (which I think he’s doing if I’m correct) and equality begins at day 1. Until you have equality of opportunity as in education, housing, a closing of the poverty gap and health care then those most vulnerable will always suffer. Unfortunately those inequalities are growing all the time currently. UTG!
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 16, 2020 20:54:19 GMT
So what you saying Pirate is the NHS are coping very well with the pandemic and even have a greater capacity than needed at the moment, isn't that great planning? What benefit would the government derive from 'brainwashing people' and having 'the worst economic decline in 300 years'? The answer hopefully will enlighten us. We might be in 'the worst economic decline in 300 years', but Tory 'chumocracy' have done ok with their contracts to friends for PPE and tests etc, Hedge funders like Crispin Oday who put Boris into power have made millions, billionaires have increased their wealth by about 3 trillion in total, big pharma companies set to make billions...and to top it off the government have realised the obedient, conformist, subservient masses welcome a nanny state and can be easily governed by fear and propaganda. As Lord Sumption brilliantly put it, this is the “most significant interference with personal freedom in the history of our country...the British public has not even begun to understand the seriousness of what is happening to our country...The government has discovered the power of public fear to let it get its way. It will not forget.” fear of what pirate? Because for the majority of us its not fear of dying ourselves its fear of killing someone else. Yet despite your alleged personal loss this doesn't seem to be resonating with you and I wonder why.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Dec 16, 2020 21:07:22 GMT
We might be in 'the worst economic decline in 300 years', but Tory 'chumocracy' have done ok with their contracts to friends for PPE and tests etc, Hedge funders like Crispin Oday who put Boris into power have made millions, billionaires have increased their wealth by about 3 trillion in total, big pharma companies set to make billions...and to top it off the government have realised the obedient, conformist, subservient masses welcome a nanny state and can be easily governed by fear and propaganda. As Lord Sumption brilliantly put it, this is the “most significant interference with personal freedom in the history of our country...the British public has not even begun to understand the seriousness of what is happening to our country...The government has discovered the power of public fear to let it get its way. It will not forget.” fear of what pirate? Because for the majority of us its not fear of dying ourselves its fear of killing someone else. Yet despite your alleged personal loss this doesn't seem to be resonating with you and I wonder why. It does resonate, but unfortunately this is life. The fear has manifested in many ways, one other example being people afraid to seek medical care because of Covid fears. Its a sad and difficult situation, but people should be made aware of the risks and dangers and then its up to them to live their life as they wish. On that note, “There is no specific power under the Act to confine or control the movements of healthy people....such a power would ...be inconsistent with the principle of legality" says Lord Sumption, the former Supreme Court Judge.
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Dec 16, 2020 21:33:56 GMT
I'm sorry Pirate but your desire to post negativity is likely connected with your desire to change government and that's why you can only see one side, because to see positivity doesn't suit your agenda. Individual freedom whist attractive objectively imo is only suitable for the emotionally mature which we all know lots of the population are not. There is therefore a need to control the masses because its impossible to be selective regarding each person's level of responsibility. Control has to happen to safeguard the vulnerable which is why we have laws and especially so during a pandemic. If we gave everyone freedom do you think everyone will be sensible. No it will be a ticket to be selfish and a tragedy for the weaker people of our society.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2020 6:28:17 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2020 8:21:34 GMT
Yeah you might think of every one as equal or just simply not discriminate, which is great and good on you Al. Unfortunately there is an element of society that doesn't like anyone different to them, and actively discriminate. Are you saying you have never heard anyone say anything derogatory against another just because of their race? No I'm not saying that I'm saying to curb racism it has to be fair or it won't be taken up. Abuse should be stopped for everyone not just a favoured group. There is plenty of abuse against white people even on this forum which would be called out if it was against black people. I don't think racism will be stopped until behaviour is fair. I know we are talking in the wrong thread here so I'll leave it. Thanks for trying to explain yourself tho Al, actual racists just don't care. It's been a very good indictment of individualism.
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Dec 17, 2020 9:01:13 GMT
No I'm not saying that I'm saying to curb racism it has to be fair or it won't be taken up. Abuse should be stopped for everyone not just a favoured group. There is plenty of abuse against white people even on this forum which would be called out if it was against black people. I don't think racism will be stopped until behaviour is fair. I know we are talking in the wrong thread here so I'll leave it. Thanks for trying to explain yourself tho Al, actual racists just don't care. It's been a very good indictment of individualism. If I had my way Grover abusers would be encouraged to take responsibility and change otherwise be removed from society. That includes abusers of all people and all animals.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Dec 17, 2020 9:10:19 GMT
But you seem too hold this University of such high stature, but now it goes against your rhetoric - it's a difference of opinion? Ok let's look at it from a different direction, the quote you pulled from Bhakdi, can you please show me where you pulled it from? We'll see if he's giving scientific reasoning for the University of Mainz to shoot down. Because as far as I see it, where is Bhakdi's scientific evidence that a lockdown is "grotesque, absurd and very dangerous"? There is literature everywhere of how a lock down prevents a disease from spreading. Are you really questioning that? You're quoting a retired Covid conspiracy theorist who has shown no scientific evidence of his claims and presenting them as fact. You did the same with your other scientist a few weeks ago in the Pfizer thread too. Yes a lockdown will have economic effects, no one is saying it wouldn't. It's about finding a balance, your "scientists" that you're quoting aren't suggesting finding something in the middle, they're suggesting Covid is a hoax, the numbers aren't real, the vaccine won't make a difference and Covid is no worse than the flu. Where is the scientific evidence to back up any of those claims? I asked earlier in the thread what would happen if we lost 1% of the British population in a year. Well funnily enough, that would be roughly the amount of job losses we've seen. Would it be better for people to lose jobs and be put on furlough, or die? What about next year? And the year after? We've caused 618,000 job losses, 30,000 excess non Covid home deaths and the "biggest economic decline in 300 years" for something that has an average death age of 80 and mostly only seriously affects people with underlying health conditions. All based on the modelling predictions of Professor doom Neil Ferguson who's previous predictions for Foot and Mouth Disease were described as “not fit for purpose” and “seriously flawed” by Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University. The Coding that led to the lockdown was "totally unreliable" and a "buggy mess" that would "get you fired in private industry" say data experts.
"Across 51 locations, the median COVID-19 infection fatality rate was 0.27% (corrected 0.23%). ... In people < 70 years, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% with crude and corrected medians of 0.05%.
www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf
You really have it in for Ferguson, don't you? Are you certain that it was entirely his fault? If so, I'd be curious to read over the weekend why only one model from 1 person was built. I have no doubt there were errors in the coding, the whole thing had to be built in a matter of days. Why did every other country lock down then? Did he build models for them too? What about the Spanish flu, was he still making models back in 1918? Regarding your WHO link, thanks for posting that. I took a very quick read this morning and seems interesting, I'll have a deeper read into it later today. But just to confirm, in choosing that quote specifically, what are you trying to say about Covid? Forget lockdown, as a virus - what are you trying to say specifically?
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Dec 17, 2020 9:12:07 GMT
I know you didn't bring it up Oldie, but can we not do the whole race thing yet again? Plenty of threads in this section for that already Reading this thread has been funny, ironic, head-shaking at some of the moronic it-will-be-alright views, but finally it got to what is pretty near the base of the need for health care, people being treated equally and most things. Gassy, you're right to stop us going back to discussing racism so I won’t. But oldie is right to support a meritocracy (which I think he’s doing if I’m correct) and equality begins at day 1. Until you have equality of opportunity as in education, housing, a closing of the poverty gap and health care then those most vulnerable will always suffer. Unfortunately those inequalities are growing all the time currently. UTG! Don't get me wrong wareham - I think everyone here knows my views on racism in the UK, I just feel that there are a few threads in GC where we've gone round in circles on racism and Covid already.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Dec 17, 2020 9:43:30 GMT
Reading this thread has been funny, ironic, head-shaking at some of the moronic it-will-be-alright views, but finally it got to what is pretty near the base of the need for health care, people being treated equally and most things. Gassy, you're right to stop us going back to discussing racism so I won’t. But oldie is right to support a meritocracy (which I think he’s doing if I’m correct) and equality begins at day 1. Until you have equality of opportunity as in education, housing, a closing of the poverty gap and health care then those most vulnerable will always suffer. Unfortunately those inequalities are growing all the time currently. UTG! Don't get me wrong wareham - I think everyone here knows my views on racism in the UK, I just feel that there are a few threads in GC where we've gone round in circles on racism and Covid already. No, I appreciate that and I agree with you. UTG!
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Dec 17, 2020 13:47:54 GMT
We've caused 618,000 job losses, 30,000 excess non Covid home deaths and the "biggest economic decline in 300 years" for something that has an average death age of 80 and mostly only seriously affects people with underlying health conditions. All based on the modelling predictions of Professor doom Neil Ferguson who's previous predictions for Foot and Mouth Disease were described as “not fit for purpose” and “seriously flawed” by Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University. The Coding that led to the lockdown was "totally unreliable" and a "buggy mess" that would "get you fired in private industry" say data experts.
"Across 51 locations, the median COVID-19 infection fatality rate was 0.27% (corrected 0.23%). ... In people < 70 years, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% with crude and corrected medians of 0.05%.
www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf
You really have it in for Ferguson, don't you? Are you certain that it was entirely his fault? If so, I'd be curious to read over the weekend why only one model from 1 person was built. I have no doubt there were errors in the coding, the whole thing had to be built in a matter of days. Why did every other country lock down then? Did he build models for them too? What about the Spanish flu, was he still making models back in 1918? Regarding your WHO link, thanks for posting that. I took a very quick read this morning and seems interesting, I'll have a deeper read into it later today. But just to confirm, in choosing that quote specifically, what are you trying to say about Covid? Forget lockdown, as a virus - what are you trying to say specifically? Professor John Ashton, a former regional director of public health for North West England, accused No 10 of relying on a ‘little clique’ of researchers and failing to consult a wider pool of academics. I don't personally "have it in for Ferguson", but with his record for modelling and predictions, I found it strange how they were following and so trusting of him again. It's not just Ferguson's predictions of up to 50,000 people dieing from 'mad cow disease' (increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep), that were wrong. The reality was only 178 people in the UK have died from CJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh (2017). Other 'Professor Doom' predictions include: In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1. By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases. In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the Government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK. In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK. As for the Spanish Flu of 1918, as the BBC noted "It is dangerous to draw too many parallels between coronavirus and the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic...Covid-19 is an entirely new disease, which disproportionately affects older people."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2020 13:52:09 GMT
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Dec 17, 2020 13:54:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Dec 17, 2020 14:29:11 GMT
You really have it in for Ferguson, don't you? Are you certain that it was entirely his fault? If so, I'd be curious to read over the weekend why only one model from 1 person was built. I have no doubt there were errors in the coding, the whole thing had to be built in a matter of days. Why did every other country lock down then? Did he build models for them too? What about the Spanish flu, was he still making models back in 1918? Regarding your WHO link, thanks for posting that. I took a very quick read this morning and seems interesting, I'll have a deeper read into it later today. But just to confirm, in choosing that quote specifically, what are you trying to say about Covid? Forget lockdown, as a virus - what are you trying to say specifically? Professor John Ashton, a former regional director of public health for North West England, accused No 10 of relying on a ‘little clique’ of researchers and failing to consult a wider pool of academics. I don't personally "have it in for Ferguson", but with his record for modelling and predictions, I found it strange how they were following and so trusting of him again. It's not just Ferguson's predictions of up to 50,000 people dieing from 'mad cow disease' (increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep), that were wrong. The reality was only 178 people in the UK have died from CJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh (2017). Other 'Professor Doom' predictions include: In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1. By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases. In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the Government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK. In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK. As for the Spanish Flu of 1918, as the BBC noted "It is dangerous to draw too many parallels between coronavirus and the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic...Covid-19 is an entirely new disease, which disproportionately affects older people." Maybe so, but didn't pretty much every academic (and anyone with a brain) say we should lock down earlier? That government decision making was too late? So which is it Pirate, as you're giving mixed messages. One day you're discrediting the WHO, the next you're posting their publications as proof of your opinion. Have some consistency man. I dont think they were only trusting Ferguson, there was an entire panel and SAGE committee. You've single handedly picked Ferguson as your fall guy to discredit every single decision they've made - which frankly is silly to say the least. Your point on Spanish flu doesn't make sense to the context in which we're discussing, and you know it. Did Ferguson single handedly provide modelling for every country in the world? Or were we the only country in the world to lock down? You conveniently missed that in your weekly attempt of blaming the world on Ferguson. On Spanish flu, we can compare and BBC notes "it's dangerous to draw too many". We've drawn 1, which is a lock down. Do you disagree that they locked down? Is that too dangerous to discuss, or would you rather sling further sand to avoid the topic in discussion? If you wouldn't mind also answering from my previous post - what are you trying to tell us specifically about the virus? We know your opinion on lockdowns, but you keep posting conspiracy theorists and specific points about the virus. Please tell us specifically what it is you're wanting to say, instead of just posting a quote.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Dec 17, 2020 16:10:56 GMT
Professor John Ashton, a former regional director of public health for North West England, accused No 10 of relying on a ‘little clique’ of researchers and failing to consult a wider pool of academics. I don't personally "have it in for Ferguson", but with his record for modelling and predictions, I found it strange how they were following and so trusting of him again. It's not just Ferguson's predictions of up to 50,000 people dieing from 'mad cow disease' (increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep), that were wrong. The reality was only 178 people in the UK have died from CJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh (2017). Other 'Professor Doom' predictions include: In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1. By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases. In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the Government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK. In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK. As for the Spanish Flu of 1918, as the BBC noted "It is dangerous to draw too many parallels between coronavirus and the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic...Covid-19 is an entirely new disease, which disproportionately affects older people." Maybe so, but didn't pretty much every academic (and anyone with a brain) say we should lock down earlier? That government decision making was too late? So which is it Pirate, as you're giving mixed messages. One day you're discrediting the WHO, the next you're posting their publications as proof of your opinion. Have some consistency man. I dont think they were only trusting Ferguson, there was an entire panel and SAGE committee. You've single handedly picked Ferguson as your fall guy to discredit every single decision they've made - which frankly is silly to say the least. Your point on Spanish flu doesn't make sense to the context in which we're discussing, and you know it. Did Ferguson single handedly provide modelling for every country in the world? Or were we the only country in the world to lock down? You conveniently missed that in your weekly attempt of blaming the world on Ferguson. On Spanish flu, we can compare and BBC notes "it's dangerous to draw too many". We've drawn 1, which is a lock down. Do you disagree that they locked down? Is that too dangerous to discuss, or would you rather sling further sand to avoid the topic in discussion? If you wouldn't mind also answering from my previous post - what are you trying to tell us specifically about the virus? We know your opinion on lockdowns, but you keep posting conspiracy theorists and specific points about the virus. Please tell us specifically what it is you're wanting to say, instead of just posting a quote. No, every academic with a brain didn't say we should lock down earlier, but the medical experts with a different view point countering the narrative are being censored, removed and pushed out of the conversation, or in your little world are smeered as a "conspiracy theorist". As the website off-guardian put it: "When the last dissenting voice is finally shut down, the establishment will claim the “science is settled.” The award winning Epidemiologist from University of Oxford, professor Sunetra Gupta, argued against the lockdown and questioned the data produced by Professor Neil Ferguson. One of the world's top Epidemiologists from Stanford University, Professor John Ioannidis, argued against lockdowns and said we are “once-in-a-century evidence fiasco” and "lockdown is a nuclear weapon that destroys everything". Professor Ioannidis was essentially ostracised for presenting early data that put the infection fatality rate lower than the merchants of doom were saying. And now? The World Health Organisation has published a peer-reviewed paper by Professor Ioannidis that states: “the inferred infection fatality rates tended to be much lower than estimates made earlier in the pandemic.” Dr Jean-François Toussaint is a French doctor and professor of physiology at the Université Paris-Descartes and is also director of the Institute for Biomedical Research and Sports Epidemiology (IRMES) and a former member of the High Council of Public Health, he argued: "[The Lockdown] was guided by estimates that were proposed on March 12…In this work, however, many things were wrong: the models were wrong, the projections were wrong; the simulations are still not reproducible, the justifications remain unfounded. And the studies currently published repeat the same errors: naive and outdated models, unstable algorithms, useless predictions…Yet it is on such simulations that the paralysis of half of humanity was played out." "In addition to those directly linked to the essential measures to combat SARS-CoV-2, the social, economic and health consequences of generalized confinement will be considerable. It is to be expected that all of these effects will lead to a decline in life expectancy in the coming years." As I've said previously, the lockdowns are disproportionate and do more harm than good for a virus that isn't as deadly as we were led to believe.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Dec 17, 2020 16:25:42 GMT
Maybe so, but didn't pretty much every academic (and anyone with a brain) say we should lock down earlier? That government decision making was too late? So which is it Pirate, as you're giving mixed messages. One day you're discrediting the WHO, the next you're posting their publications as proof of your opinion. Have some consistency man. I dont think they were only trusting Ferguson, there was an entire panel and SAGE committee. You've single handedly picked Ferguson as your fall guy to discredit every single decision they've made - which frankly is silly to say the least. Your point on Spanish flu doesn't make sense to the context in which we're discussing, and you know it. Did Ferguson single handedly provide modelling for every country in the world? Or were we the only country in the world to lock down? You conveniently missed that in your weekly attempt of blaming the world on Ferguson. On Spanish flu, we can compare and BBC notes "it's dangerous to draw too many". We've drawn 1, which is a lock down. Do you disagree that they locked down? Is that too dangerous to discuss, or would you rather sling further sand to avoid the topic in discussion? If you wouldn't mind also answering from my previous post - what are you trying to tell us specifically about the virus? We know your opinion on lockdowns, but you keep posting conspiracy theorists and specific points about the virus. Please tell us specifically what it is you're wanting to say, instead of just posting a quote. No, every academic with a brain didn't say we should lock down earlier, but the medical experts with a different view point countering the narrative are being censored, removed and pushed out of the conversation, or in your little world are smeered as a "conspiracy theorist". As the website off-guardian put it: "When the last dissenting voice is finally shut down, the establishment will claim the “science is settled.” The award winning Epidemiologist from University of Oxford, professor Sunetra Gupta, argued against the lockdown and questioned the data produced by Professor Neil Ferguson. One of the world's top Epidemiologists from Stanford University, Professor John Ioannidis, argued against lockdowns and said we are “once-in-a-century evidence fiasco” and "lockdown is a nuclear weapon that destroys everything". Professor Ioannidis was essentially ostracised for presenting early data that put the infection fatality rate lower than the merchants of doom were saying. And now? The World Health Organisation has published a peer-reviewed paper by Professor Ioannidis that states: “the inferred infection fatality rates tended to be much lower than estimates made earlier in the pandemic.” Dr Jean-François Toussaint is a French doctor and professor of physiology at the Université Paris-Descartes and is also director of the Institute for Biomedical Research and Sports Epidemiology (IRMES) and a former member of the High Council of Public Health, he argued: "[The Lockdown] was guided by estimates that were proposed on March 12…In this work, however, many things were wrong: the models were wrong, the projections were wrong; the simulations are still not reproducible, the justifications remain unfounded. And the studies currently published repeat the same errors: naive and outdated models, unstable algorithms, useless predictions…Yet it is on such simulations that the paralysis of half of humanity was played out." "In addition to those directly linked to the essential measures to combat SARS-CoV-2, the social, economic and health consequences of generalized confinement will be considerable. It is to be expected that all of these effects will lead to a decline in life expectancy in the coming years." As I've said previously, the lockdowns are disproportionate and do more harm than good for a virus that isn't as deadly as we were led to believe. My god man, you've failed to address a single point in my post. In fact, all you've done is just further my case of what I said would happen: "would you rather sling further sand to avoid the topic in discussion? If you wouldn't mind also answering from my previous post - what are you trying to tell us specifically about the virus? We know your opinion on lockdowns, but you keep posting conspiracy theorists and specific points about the virus. Please tell us specifically what it is you're wanting to say, instead of just posting a quote." C'mon Pirate, why do you keep ignoring the questions?
|
|