|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jul 22, 2024 17:31:47 GMT
FA cleared him and an independent enquiry did not. FA then had no choice. The lady concerned has plenty of form in these matters and is fast becoming another Vine when it comes to sueing people from where I stand. |
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Jul 22, 2024 17:36:45 GMT
FA cleared him and an independent enquiry did not. FA then had no choice. The lady concerned has plenty of form in these matters and is fast becoming another Vine when it comes to sueing people from where I stand. Aye, from where you stand. You couldn’t be bothered to even Google the case let alone hold an enquiry. Carry on. Daft. |
|
|
|
Post by returngas on Jul 22, 2024 17:41:06 GMT
FA cleared him and an independent enquiry did not. FA then had no choice. The lady concerned has plenty of form in these matters and is fast becoming another Vine when it comes to sueing people from where I stand. Wasn't she told to keep her family away as they did not want Ebola in the camp? What was the girl supposed to do? Punch the guy on the nose and get sacked herself? She complained and the investigation found the guy was being racist in saying that to her. Do you think she should just suck up this sort of nasty talk framed as a joke? |
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Jul 22, 2024 17:46:53 GMT
FA cleared him and an independent enquiry did not. FA then had no choice. The lady concerned has plenty of form in these matters and is fast becoming another Vine when it comes to sueing people from where I stand. Wasn't she told to keep her family away as they did not want Ebola in the camp? What was the girl supposed to do? Punch the guy on the nose and get sacked herself? She complained and the investigation found the guy was being racist in saying that to her. Do you think she should just suck up this sort of nasty talk framed as a joke? Also worth noting Sampson had an inappropriate relationship with a player/players at Bristol Academy which, is a safe guarding issue. Let’s not actually read about what went on though. |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jul 22, 2024 17:51:08 GMT
Wasn't she told to keep her family away as they did not want Ebola in the camp? What was the girl supposed to do? Punch the guy on the nose and get sacked herself? She complained and the investigation found the guy was being racist in saying that to her. Do you think she should just suck up this sort of nasty talk framed as a joke? Also worth noting Sampson had an inappropriate relationship with a player/players at Bristol Academy which, is a safe guarding issue. Let’s not actually read about what went on though. That was the reason why he was sacked by England not for the Aluko allegations. |
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jul 22, 2024 18:07:05 GMT
I find it hard to believe that he is still being paid by us. He must, after his social media activities since leaving us, be in breach of contract. It may well be that we have finally ceased his contract but it’s never been made public that we have done so.
I’ve no idea but surely even our legal team would be able to do this?
UTG!
|
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Jul 22, 2024 18:22:34 GMT
FA cleared him and an independent enquiry did not. FA then had no choice. The lady concerned has plenty of form in these matters and is fast becoming another Vine when it comes to sueing people from where I stand. You do know she is a qualified lawyer? If people keep saying malicious sh.it then people are gonna take them to court over it. We shouldn't judge someone negatively for not putting up with that crap, we should be applauding the fact that they are standing against that behaviour. |
|
|
|
Post by Gasshole on Jul 22, 2024 18:24:00 GMT
Best place for controversial opinions is in your head. Maybe occasionally let one slip out when your down the pub with your mates. If it doesn’t go down well , they’ll probably not remember it the next day.
|
|
|
|
Post by singupgas on Jul 22, 2024 18:24:12 GMT
I find it hard to believe that he is still being paid by us. He must, after his social media activities since leaving us, be in breach of contract. It may well be that we have finally ceased his contract but it’s never been made public that we have done so. I’ve no idea but surely even our legal team would be able to do this? UTG! Why nothing he has said is damaging to us...wasn't he already sacked when comments made? So not really representing the club. |
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Jul 22, 2024 18:31:48 GMT
Mainstream media are showing images of him at Fleetwood, when mentioning him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 22, 2024 19:08:22 GMT
I find it hard to believe that he is still being paid by us. He must, after his social media activities since leaving us, be in breach of contract. It may well be that we have finally ceased his contract but it’s never been made public that we have done so. I’ve no idea but surely even our legal team would be able to do this? UTG! Why nothing he has said is damaging to us...wasn't he already sacked when comments made? So not really representing the club. Can somebody be sacked twice by the same employer? I assume originally he was dismissed for poor performance and so entitled to the usual pay off, can he now be dismissed again for Gross Misconduct without any compensation if he his convicted, although the chances are he'll now drag this out for months before the trial takes place. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 22, 2024 19:11:26 GMT
Best place for controversial opinions is in your head. Maybe occasionally let one slip out when your down the pub with your mates. If it doesn’t go down well , they’ll probably not remember it the next day. You'd have thought before starting his new career on X he'd have taken some legal advice on what he could and could not tweet, blowing £100K's on costs & damages plus potentially getting another criminal conviction seems insane for somebody in his position. |
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Jul 22, 2024 21:10:59 GMT
Best place for controversial opinions is in your head. Maybe occasionally let one slip out when your down the pub with your mates. If it doesn’t go down well , they’ll probably not remember it the next day. You'd have thought before starting his new career on X he'd have taken some legal advice on what he could and could not tweet, blowing £100K's on costs & damages plus potentially getting another criminal conviction seems insane for somebody in his position. Someone in his position, absolutely agree. But he doesn't think he has to abide by the law. Seems to be hitting self destruct again. |
|
|
|
Post by purdownpoacher1 on Jul 22, 2024 21:11:57 GMT
He's quickly learning if you dare tweet sometimes home truths the left/powerful media company's like bbc/itv/sky don't like you end up in the dock to the tune of hundreds of k. Spot on ! Couldn’t agree more ! 💙 |
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Jul 22, 2024 21:20:26 GMT
He's quickly learning if you dare tweet sometimes home truths the left/powerful media company's like bbc/itv/sky don't like you end up in the dock to the tune of hundreds of k. Spot on ! Couldn’t agree more ! 💙 Got any examples of when this has happened? |
|
|
|
Post by jungleboogie on Jul 23, 2024 9:05:22 GMT
He's quickly learning if you dare tweet sometimes home truths the left/powerful media company's like bbc/itv/sky don't like you end up in the dock to the tune of hundreds of k. Spot on ! Couldn’t agree more ! 💙 I bet you say 'Woke' a lot down the pub and think you're being very clever???  |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jul 23, 2024 9:33:56 GMT
He's quickly learning if you dare tweet sometimes home truths the left/powerful media company's like bbc/itv/sky don't like you end up in the dock to the tune of hundreds of k. It's perfectly possible to criticise without being offensive. I disagree with Barton on his opinion that women's shouldn't commentate on the men's game because they haven't played it and the differences between the two, but I would say that is at least that is 'justifiable' what you can't do, is just endless slag people off for it though |
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jul 23, 2024 15:23:56 GMT
I find it hard to believe that he is still being paid by us. He must, after his social media activities since leaving us, be in breach of contract. It may well be that we have finally ceased his contract but it’s never been made public that we have done so. I’ve no idea but surely even our legal team would be able to do this? UTG! Why nothing he has said is damaging to us...wasn't he already sacked when comments made? So not really representing the club. Sorry, unclear what you mean. Does he have to say something “damaging to us” to be in breach of contract? And if he is still being paid as he is on gardening leave whilst his contract expires then surely he’s still subject to the contract. Isn’t he? Of course we may not know the contractual position and it may be he isn’t being paid and everything has ended. You may know more and know what the position is but I’m not sure that will be widely known. UTG! |
|
|
|
Post by singupgas on Jul 23, 2024 15:33:47 GMT
Why nothing he has said is damaging to us...wasn't he already sacked when comments made? So not really representing the club. Sorry, unclear what you mean. Does he have to say something “damaging to us” to be in breach of contract? And if he is still being paid as he is on gardening leave whilst his contract expires then surely he’s still subject to the contract. Isn’t he? Of course we may not know the contractual position and it may be he isn’t being paid and everything has ended. You may know more and know what the position is but I’m not sure that will be widely known. UTG! I don't know a lot. The fact that he is still being paid, it would suggest he hasn't breached the contract. Hopefully one day he will learn that in this day, you can't just say and do what you like, especially online where it will be there for everyone to see. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 23, 2024 15:40:48 GMT
Why nothing he has said is damaging to us...wasn't he already sacked when comments made? So not really representing the club. Sorry, unclear what you mean. Does he have to say something “damaging to us” to be in breach of contract? And if he is still being paid as he is on gardening leave whilst his contract expires then surely he’s still subject to the contract. Isn’t he? Of course we may not know the contractual position and it may be he isn’t being paid and everything has ended. You may know more and know what the position is but I’m not sure that will be widely known. UTG! Surely that's how contracts work, as employers can't just dismiss their employees for acting like a kn0b on social media? JB last tweeted he was being paid by us until January. I can't believe he posted this tweet today: x.com/Joey7Barton/status/1815642720964059291 |
|
